Quantcast
Channel: Central Govt Employees News – 8th Pay Commission – Staff News
Viewing all 16216 articles
Browse latest View live

Expected DA from Jan-2020 – AICPIN for the month of Sep 2019 increased by 2 points

$
0
0

Expected DA from Jan-2020 – AICPIN for the month of Sep 2019 increased by 2 points

No. 5/112019-CPI
GOVERNMENT  OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT
LABOUR BUREAU

‘CLEREMONT’, SHIMLA-171004
DATED: 31st October, 2019

Press Release

Consumer Price Index for Industrial Workers (CPI-IW) – September, 2019

 

The All-India CPI-IW for September, 2019 increased by 2 points and pegged at 322 (three hundred and twenty two). On 1-month percentage change it increased by (+) 0.63 per cent between August, 2019 and September, 2019 which was static between the same two months a year back.

The maximum upward pressure to the change in current index came from Food group contributing (+) 2.20 percentage points to the total change. At item level, Rice, Wheat, Wheat Atta, Coconut Oil, Groundnut Oil, Goat Meat, Dairy Milk, Milk Buffallo, Milk Cow, Pure Ghee, Chillies Dry, Garlic, Onion, Briajal, Cauliflower, Peas, Potato, Radish, Coconut, Lemon, Sugar, Cooking Gas, Soft Coke, Under Garments, Medicine (Allopathic), Petrol, etc. are responsible for the increase in index. However, this increase was checked by Ginger, Cabbage, Carrot, French Bean, Green Coriander Leaves, Tomato, Apple, Hair Oil, Toilet Soap, etc., putting downward pressure on the index.

View: Expected DA – AICPIN for the month of August 2019 increased by 1 point

The year-on-year inflation based on CPI-IW stood at 6.98 per cent for September, 2019 as compared to 6.31 per cent for the previous month and 5′.61 per cent during the corresponding month of the previous year. Similarly, the Food inflation stood at 7.05 per cent against 5.10 per cent ofthe previous month and 0.00 per cent during the corresponding month of the previous year.

september-cpi-iw-expected-da-from-jan-2020

At centre level Bokaro, Raniganj, Mumbai, Ahmedabad and Agra observed the maximum increase of 8 points each followed by Jalandhar (7 points) and Godavarikhani (6 points). Among others, 5 points increase was observed in 3 centres, 4 points in 10 centres, 3 points in 6 centres, 2 points in 11 centres and 1 point in 19 centres. On the contrary, Goa recorded a maximum decrease of 4 points followed by Chennai (3 points). Among others, 2 points decrease was observed in 2 centre and 1 point in 4 centres. Rest of the 14 centres’ indices remained stationary.

The indices of 31 centres are above All-India Index and 46 centres’ indices are below national average. The index of Ernakulam centre remained at par with All-India Index.

The next issue of CPI-IW for the month of October, 2019 will be released on Friday 29th November, 2019. The same will also be available on the office website  www.labourbureaunew.gov.in.

 

(AMRIT LAL JANGID)
DEPUTY  DIRECTOR

Click here to view/download the PDF

Source: Labour Bureau

The post Expected DA from Jan-2020 – AICPIN for the month of Sep 2019 increased by 2 points appeared first on Central Govt Employees - 7th Pay Commission - Staff News.


Air Ticket purchased from unauthorised agent on LTC: DoPT OM reg ATR of Standing Committee Meeting

$
0
0

Air Ticket purchased from unauthorised agent on LTC: DoPT OM reg ATR of Standing Committee Meeting

 

No.3/1/2019- JCA (Pt)
Government of India
Department of Personnel & Training
Establishment (JCA) Section

North Block, New Delhi – 110 001
Dated:  October, 2019

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

Subject: Grant of one time relaxation to the Central Govt. Employees who have availed LTC-80 and travelled by air by purchasing ticket from authorities other than authorized agents.

The undersigned is directed to forward herewith a copy of letter no. NC-JCM-2019/DOPT{LTC) dated 26/09/2019 received from Secretary, Staff Side, National Council (JCM) addressed to the Secretary (Personnel) on “Grant of one time relaxation to the Central Govt. Employees who have availed LTC-80 and travelled by air by purchasing ticket from authorities other than authorized agents”. The above proposal was discussed during the Standing Committee meeting of the National Council (JCM) held on 7-3-2019,

View: LTC unauthorised Ticket purchase: Action Taken Report of Standing Committee Meeting

2. It is requested that Establishment (A-IV) Division, DOPT, may provide the Action Taken Statement to enable this Division to take appropriate action at earliest.

3. This issues with the approval of the competent authority.

(S T Selvi Singh)
Under Secretary (JCA)

Encl.: as above

To

Deputy Secretary (E-I)
Establishment Division
North Block, New Delhi

Copy to:

(i) Joint Secretary (E-I), Establishment Division, North Block, New Delhi
(ii) Secretary, Staff Side, NC(JCM), 13-C, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi for information.

dopt-om-air-ticket-purchased-by-unauthorised-agent-on-ltc

Source: Confederation

The post Air Ticket purchased from unauthorised agent on LTC: DoPT OM reg ATR of Standing Committee Meeting appeared first on Central Govt Employees - 7th Pay Commission - Staff News.

7th Pay Commission – DNI on financial upgradation: Clarification on Rule 10 of CCS RP Rules, 2016

$
0
0

7th Pay Commission – DNI on financial upgradation: Clarification on Rule 10 of CCS RP Rules, 2016

Grant of next increment on 1st January when an employee promoted or getting financial upgrdation on 1st July and granted two increments – DoE O.M dated 29.10.2019

No. 421/2027 1C/LANA
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Expenditure

North Block, New Delhi-110001
Dated the 29th October, 2019

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

Subject: Drawal of next increment under Rule 10 of Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2016-regarding.

[adinseter name=”p1″]

The undersigned is directed to refer to para 8(i) of the Ministry of Home Affairs U.O. No. 300/14/Pr.A.0./Admn/MHA/23/2018-19/456 dated 29.04.2019 seeking clarifications regarding drawal of next increment, referring the instructions contained in Department of Expenditure Office Memorandum No. 4-21/2017-IC/E.IIIA dated 31.07.2018, as to whether an employee promoted or getting financial upgrdation on 01.07.2016 and granted two increments i.e. first annual increment and second promotional increment, is eligible for his next increment after completion of six months period on 01.01.2017 or after expiry of one year period on 01.07.2017.

View: 7th CPC ; Date of Next Increment on Promotion/MACP: Clarification on Rule 10 of CCS RP Rules, 2016

2. The matter has been examined in this Department. In terms of the instructions contained in this Department’s above referred O.M. dated 31.07.2018, the employees who are getting promotion/financial upgradation on 1st July and receiving the benefit of two increments i.e. the first annual increment due on 1st July and the second notional increment on account of promotion, will accrue their subsequent increment on the following 1st January, after completion of six months period.

Sd/-
(Ram Gopal)
Under Secretary (E.II|A)
Phone- 2095629

To
Ministry of Home Affairs
(Shri Subhash Chandra- Controller of Accounts (Home)
O/o Principal accounts Officer (Admn.)
Major Dhyan Chand National Stadium,
Near India Gate, New Dethi

fin-min-clarification-on-7thcpc-increment-rule-10

Source: Confederation
[http://confederationhq.blogspot.com/2019/10/blog-post_10.html]

The post 7th Pay Commission – DNI on financial upgradation: Clarification on Rule 10 of CCS RP Rules, 2016 appeared first on Central Govt Employees - 7th Pay Commission - Staff News.

Treatment taken by ECHS beneficiaries in empanelled hospitals: Clarification by DESW

$
0
0

Treatment taken by ECHS beneficiaries in empanelled hospitals: Clarification by DESW

File No. 22D(01)/26018/ (WE)/D( Res -1)
Government of India
Ministry of Defence
Department of Ex-Servicemen Welfare

Room No. 221,B,Wing
Sena Bhavan, New Delhi

Dated: 25 Sept. 2019

To

The Managing Director
Central Organisation
Ex-servicemen Contributory Health Scheme
Thimaya Marg
Gopinath Circle
Delhi Cantt.

Subject: Clarification regarding definition of empanelled hospital and consequent handling of cases of treatment taken by ECHS beneficiaries in such hospitals.

Sir,

The undersigned is directed to refer to CO, ECHS letter No.49770/AG/ECHS /Treatment dated 23-8-2019 and to issue the following clarifications.

(i) A hospital shall be considered to be on ECHS panel only when it has a valid MoA or it is not under orders of stop referral.

(ii) If any hospital does not have a valid MoA or it is under stop referral and an ECHS beneficiary takes treatment in such hospital in emergency by making payment, the amount should be re-imbursed to the ECHS beneficiary as per CGHS rates.

(iii) If a hospital is without valid MoA or it is under stop referral and any ECHS beneficiary having a valid referral from ECHS polyclinic choses to take treatment in such hospital due to having taken treatment in the same hospital earlier as well he should be allowed to take treatment in the hospital after making payment to the hospital and seek re-imbursement at CGHS rates.

(iv) If a hospital is empanelled but due to huge pending bills remaining unpaid refuses to extend cashless treatment and an ECHS beneficiary takes treatment therein and seek reimbursement, the same shall be allowed at CGHS rates. However, at the same time CO, ECHS will send a proposal to MoD for disempanelment of this hospital.

2. CO, ECHS may take necessary action accordingly.

Yours faithfully,

(A. K. Karn)
Under Secretary (WE)

desw-clarification-on-echs-25-09-2019

Source: Click here to view/download
[http://desw.gov.in/sites/default/files/DESW-25.09.2019.pdf]

The post Treatment taken by ECHS beneficiaries in empanelled hospitals: Clarification by DESW appeared first on Central Govt Employees - 7th Pay Commission - Staff News.

MACP w.e.f. 01.01.2006 – Supreme Court Order is not applicable to civilian employees: DoPT’s clarification

$
0
0

MACP w.e.f. 01.01.2006 – Supreme Court Order is not applicable to civilian employees: DoPT’s clarification

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF DEFENCE
OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL CONTROLLER OF ACCOUNTS (FYS)
10-A, S.K. BOSE ROAD, KOLKATA: 700001
Pay/ Tech

Part. I Office Order No. AT/ 08

Date:16/10/2019

To

All CsFA/AIl Br. AOs

Subject: Representation regarding MACP Scheme

A copy of clarification on the above subject issued vide DOPT OM No- 35034/3/2019-Estt(D) dated-27/02/2019 received vide CGDA No-CGDA/ NAVY/03/ Misc-III/2019 dated-13/09/2019, is forwarded herewith for information, guidance and compliance, please.

Enclo: above

(Dr. DL Meena)
Deputy Controller of Accounts (Fys)
No. Pay/Tech-I/01(7% CPC), dated-\5/10/19 |


macp-wef-01-01-2006-dopt-clarification

Dy No. 1351516/19/CR

35034/3/2019-Estt(D)
Government of India
Ministry of Personnel, Public Accounts
(Department of Personnel &  Training )

 

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

Sub: Representation regarding MACP Scheme.

 

The undersigned is directed to forward herewith a letter (in original) dated 15.12.2018 from Shri Arun Kumar Sharma on the subject of MACP and to say that the recommendations of the 6th CPC were accepted by the Government only on 29.08.2008 (30.08.2008) in case of PBOR).  The recommendations of the 6th CPC were required to be examined and a Scheme was to be formulated in consultation with Department of Expenditure and the same took considerable time for its implementation.  Before implementation of the Scheme a cut off date had to be decided / fixed. Accordingly, the Government has taken a conscious decision for implementing the MACPS w.e.f. 01.09.2008.  THough the MACPS came into existence only w.e.f. 01.09.2008 the benefits of the existing ACP Scheme of August 1999, was allowed to the Government servants upto 31.08.2008.

2. VI Pay Commission recommended separate Schemes for Civilian and the Defence Personnel.  After the recommendations were considered and approved by the Cabinet, D/o Expenditure issued Resolution dated 29.08.2008 in respect of Civilian employees.  Ministry of Defence issued Resolution dated 30.08.2008 regarding extension of VI CPC benefits to Armed Forces Personnel.  Thus the Civilian and the PBOR personnel are governed by two different Resolutions/ two different MACP Schemes.

3. The instant order of Hon’ble Supreme Court is in the context of MACP Scheme issued by Ministry of Defence with regard o PBOR and hence the order of Hon’ble Apex Court is not applicable to the MACP Scheme issued by DoP&T for civilian employees.

4. However, in case, clarification/ interpretation of any of the rule position is required, the proposal may be referred to this Department in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Department’s OM No. 43011/9/2014-Estt.-(D) dated 28th October, 2015 through a self contained note giving full facts connected with the case in a file and with the approval of Secretary of the Administrative Ministry.

Encl. As above.

(Kuldeep Chaudhary)
Selection Officer

The Secretary,
Ministry of Defnece,
South Block, New Delhi

Copy to:
Shri Arun Kumar Sharma, Draughtsman, O/o CWE Bikaner.  It is advised that future correspondence in the matter if any may be directly made to Ministry of Defence is the concerned Administrative Ministry.

Source: Click here to view/download the PDF

[http://pcafys.nic.in/files/MACP231019.pdf]

The post MACP w.e.f. 01.01.2006 – Supreme Court Order is not applicable to civilian employees: DoPT’s clarification appeared first on Central Govt Employees - 7th Pay Commission - Staff News.

7th CPC Pensionary Benefit w.e.f. 01.01.2016 for person retired on superannuation w.e.f. 31.12.2015 not admissible: High Court

$
0
0

7th CPC Pensionary Benefit w.e.f. 01.01.2016 for person retired on superannuation w.e.f. 31.12.2015 not admissible: High Court

Matter : 7th CPC Pensionary Benefit w.e.f. 01.01.2016 for person retired on superannuation w.e.f. 31.12.2015
Order by Case Number Date of Judgment/Order Party VIEW
Hon’ble Prinicipal CAT, New Delhi OA No. 571/2017 17/04/2018 G.C. YADAV
Vs.
UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Click to view
Hon’ble High Court, New Delhi W.P.(C)–9062/2018 23/10/2018 UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Vs.

G.C. YADAV
Scroll below

For CAT Order view: 7th CPC Pensionary Benefit w.e.f. 01.01.2016 for person retired on superannuation w.e.f. 31.12.2015: CAT Principal Bench, New Delhi Order

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of Decision:23.10.2018

W.P.(C) 9062/2018 & C.M. No. 34892/2018

UNION OF INDIA & ORS ….. Petitioner

Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC with
Mr.Nikhil Bhardwaj, Adv.

versus

G.C. YADAV

….. Respondent

Through:     respondent in person.

CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA

VIPIN SANGHI, J. (ORAL)

1.  Issue notice. The respondent is present in person and he accepts notice. He states that he shall be arguing the case in person and that he is ready to proceed with the matter today itself. Accordingly, with the consent of parties, we have proceeded to hear the writ petition finally since the case involves determination of a legal issue and there is not dispute on facts. We proceed to judgment.

2. The Union of India has preferred the present writ petition to assail the order  dated  17.04.2018  passed  by  the  Central  Administrative  Tribunal,

Principal Bench, New Delhi (the Tribunal) in O.A. No. 571/17. By the impugned order, the Tribunal allowed the original application preferred by the respondent and held that the respondent – applicant is deemed to have retired from service on 01.01.2016. Consequently, the Tribunal held that he was entitled to get all his pensionary benefits in accordance with the Seventh Central Pay Commission recommendations. The office memorandum dated 03.01.2017 issued by the petitioner, asserting that the respondent had retired on 31.12.2015 was quashed and set aside, and the petitioner was directed to fix the retiral benefits of the respondent in accordance with Seventh Central Pay Commission, which were implemented vide O.M. dated 04.08.2016 in respect of pensioners retiring on or after 01.01.2016.

3. The date of birth of the respondent is 01.01.1956. Considering that the age of retirement/ superannuation is 60 years, he attained the said age on 31.12.2015. As per the petitioner, the subject of retirement is governed by FR 56 in chapter 9 of the FR/SR. The said chapter deals with retirements. FR 56 in so far as it is relevant, reads as follows:

“F.R. 56 (a) Except as otherwise provided in this rule, every Government servant shall retire from service on the afternoon of the last day of the month in which he attains the age of sixty years:

Provided that a Government servant whose date of birth is the first of a month shall retire from service on the afternoon of the last day of the preceding month on attaining the age of sixty years.” (emphasis supplied)

4. The submission of Mr. Bhardwaj, learned Central Government Standing Counsel is that since the date of birth of the respondent is 01.01.1956, by force of the first proviso to FR56 – which is quoted hereinabove, the respondent retired from service on the afternoon of the last day of the preceding month on attaining the age of 60 years i.e. on 31.12.2015.

5. Mr. Bhardwaj has argued that the respondent was not in service on 01.01.2016. His further submission is that pension is fixed on the basis of the last pay drawn, and the last pay drawn by the respondent was the pay that he was drawing on 31.12.2015. He further submits that the Seventh Central Pay Commission recommendations became effective – with effect from 01.01.2016 in respect of such of the employees who were in service on 01.01.2016. Thus, the respondent did not became entitled to pay revision till he superannuated on 31.12.2015.

6. Mr. Bhardwaj submits that while allowing the Original Application, the Tribunal has taken the aid of the Supreme Court in S. Banerjee V. Union of India, 1989 Supp (2) SCC 486. Mr. Bhardwaj submits that the said decision is not attracted in the present case, since in S. Banerjee (supra), the petitioner had retired on voluntarily retirement and he had sought voluntarily retirement with effect from 01.01.1986. The office order permitting the petitioner – S. Banerjee to voluntarily retire expressly stated that he was permitted “to retire voluntarily from the service of the Registry of the Supreme Court of India with effect from the forenoon of January 1, 1986”.

7. Thus, the Supreme Court concluded that it could not be said that the petitioner S. Banerjee retired on 31.12.1985. He continued to remain in service till the forenoon of 01.01.1986, and since the Fourth Central Pay Commission recommendations became effective from 01.01.1986, the petitioner S. Banerjee was held entitled to pay revision and fixation of pension on that basis, even though, on the day of retirement he was not entitled to draw any pay. Mr. Bhardwaj submits that, on the other hand, as far as the respondent is concerned, he retired on 31.12.2015. He has also referred to O.M. dated 03.01.2017 which contains reasons advanced by the petitioner while rejecting the representation of the respondent. The relevant extract from the said office memorandum reads as follows:

“2. In accordance with the orders issued by this Department on 4.8.2016 for revision of pension of past pensioners in implementation of the recommendations of 7th CPC, it has been mentioned that a pensioner/ family pensioner who become entitled to pension/ family pension w.e.f. 1.1.2016 consequent on retirement/ death of Government servant on 31.12.2015 would be covered by the orders applicable to the pre-2016 pensioners. Therefore, Shri Yadav retired on 31.12.2015 is to be treated as a pre- 2016 pensioner and his pension is required to be fixed under the provisions applicable to 6th CPC retirees and then revised w.e.f. 1.1.2016 in accordance with the OM No.38/37/16-P&PW(A) (ii), dated 4.8.2016.

3. As regards the judgment in the case of S. Benerjee, referred to in the representation of Shri Yadav as well as in the letter from DoPT, it may be mentioned that Shri Benerjee retired voluntarily w.e.f. 1.1.1986. In his case, Hon’ble Supreme Court noted the contention of the UoI that in view of the proviso of Rule 5(2) of CCS (Pension) Rules,

Shri Benerjee is not entitled to the salary for the day of his retirement and, therefore, he was not entitled to the benefits of 4th CPC which were available to those who retired on or after 1.1.1986. Hon’ble Supreme Court observed that since Shri Benerjee retired voluntarily w.e.f. 1.1.1986, he could not be said to have retired on December 1985 and, therefore, the fact that he did not draw any salary for day of which he actually retired has no bearing on the question to the date of retirement.

4. In the case of Shri Yadav, he actually retired on 31.12.15 and was not in service on 1.1.16. Judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Shri S. Benerjee has no relevance in his case. In fact Rule 5(2) of CCS (Pension) Rules has already been amended and as per the amended rule date of voluntary retirement is treated as the last working day. Therefore, those who retired voluntarily on 1.1.2016 would be eligible for pay and pension benefits of 7th CPC as a post 1.1.2016 retiree.

5. Since Shri Yadav retired on superannuation on 31.12.15, he is to be treated as a pre-2016 pensioner and is accordingly entitled to the benefit in revision of pension under the OM No.38/37/46-P&PW(A) (ii) dated 4.8.16.”

8. On the other hand, the respondent, who appears in person, submits that he attained the age of 60 years at 12:00 mid night on 31.12.2015 i.e. on the night of 31.12.2015 and 01.01.2016. He submits that the respondent became a retiree only on 01.01.2016, and in terms of the office memorandum dated 04.08.2016, he was entitled to be treated as a 2016 retiree. Consequently, his pension should have been fixed on the basis of the    pay    fixation    under    the    Seventh    Central    Pay    Commission recommendations which became effective from 01.01.2016. He also places reliance on a decision of the Madras High Court in P. Ayyamperumal V. The Registrar (CAT) and Ors., in W.P. No.15732/2017 decided on 15.09.2017. In this case, the issue was with regard to the grant of the annual increment to the employee, which fell due on 1st July.  He retired on superannuation on 30th  June.   The Division Bench of the High Court held that the petitioner had completed full years service as on 30.06.2013, and the increment fell due on 01.07.2013 on which date he was not in service. The Division Bench allowed the said petition and held that the petitioner was entitled to fixation of his pension on the basis of the increment which fell due on 01.07.2013. The Special Leave Petition against the said decision of the Madras High Court preferred by the Union of India before the Supreme Court vide SLP (C) No. 22283/2018, was dismissed on 23.07.2018.

9. The respondent submits that the decision of the Madras High Court in P.Ayyamperumal (supra) has attained finality and the said decision be followed by this Court.

10.  Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Bhardwaj; perused the record and the relevant rules, and; having considered the submissions advanced by the respondent and the decisions relied upon by him, we are of the considered view that the respondent could not be considered to have superannuated/ retired on 01.01.2016, and he could not be treated as post 2016 pensioner. We are of the view that the impugned order passed by the Tribunal cannot be sustained and is liable to be set aside.

11. Firstly, we may observe that since the date of birth of the respondent is 01.01.1956, he attained the age of 60 years i.e. the age of superannuation on 31.12.2015. The respondent appears to be reeling under the impression that he attained the age of 60 years only on 01.01.2016, which is not correct. On 01.01.2016, the respondent entered into the 61st year of his life, having completed his 60 years on 31.12.2015.

12.  The issue of retirement in respect of Central Government servants is covered by FR 56. We have already quoted the relevant extract from the said rule. The first proviso to FR 56 (a) is clearly attracted in the facts of the present case, since the date of birth of the respondent falls on the first day of the month i.e. on 01.01.1956. Consequently, by virtue of the first proviso to Rule 56 (a), respondent retired from service on the afternoon of the last day of the preceding month on attaining the age of 60 years. In the case of the respondent, that was the afternoon of 31.12.2015. Even if the expression “afternoon” is construed broadly, it could only extend to midnight of 31.12.2015 and the same would not cross the said deadline. As at the beginning of 01.01.2016 i.e. from 00.00 hrs of 01.01.2016, the respondent ceased to be a serving employee, having superannuated on 31.12.2015. At no point of time on 01.01.2016, the respondent could be said to be in active service. At no point of time, in the year 2016 the respondent worked in a post, the pay or emoluments of which were fixed on the basis of the recommendations of the Seventh Central Pay Commission. He was not entitled to receive any pay on or from 01.01.2016. Thus, the question of revision of his pay, premised on the recommendations of the Seventh Central Pay Commission did not arise. The said recommendations became effective from 01.01.2016 in respect of employees who were in service on 01.01.2016 – which the respondent was not.

13. We agree with the submission of Mr. Bhardwaj that the Tribunal has erred in placing reliance on the judgment in S. Banerjee (supra) in the facts of the present case. The material difference in the facts of S. Banerjee (supra) and the facts of the present case is that in S. Banerjee (supra), the petitioner – S. Banerjee sought voluntary retirement from a particular date i.e. 01.01.1986. It is open to an employee seeking voluntary retirement to choose the date of his voluntary retirement, unlike in the case of a superannuating Government servant whose date of retirement is determined by FR 56.

14. The Supreme Court took note of the fact in S. Banerjee (supra) that the petitioner was permitted to voluntarily retire from service from the forenoon of January 1, 1986. Thus, it could not be said that S. Banerjee had retired at any point of time on 31.12.1985. He continued to remain in service till the forenoon of 1st January, 1986. Before his retirement on the forenoon of 01.01.1986, the Fourth Central Pay Commission recommendations were implemented with effect from 01.01.1986. Thus, there was an overlap and before S. Banerjee retired, the revised pay scales under the Fourth Central Pay Commission Report came into effect. This is not the position in the present case.

15. The Supreme Court referred to Rule 5(2) of the Central Civil Service (Pension) Rules, 1972 which, inter alia provides that the day on which the Government Servant retires, or is retired or discharged, or is allowed to resign from service, shall be treated as his last working day and that in the case of a Government Servant who retires prematurely or voluntarily under clauses (j) to (m) of Rule 56 or Rule 48, or Rule 48 (a) of the Fundamental Rules, the date of retirement shall be treated as a non working day. The Supreme Court observed that even in the case of the petitioner S. Banerjee, the date of retirement was January 1, 1986 and he was not entitled to pay for January 1, 1986 – since the same was to be treated as a non working day. However, that had no bearing on the question as to the date of retirement.

16. Paragraph 6 of the judgment in S. Banerjee (supra) reads as follows;

“6. Under para 17.3, the benefits recommended will be available to employees retiring during the period, 1-1-1986 to 30-9-1986. So the employees retiring on 1-1-1986 will be entitled to the benefit under para 17.3. The question that arises for our consideration is whether the petitioner has retired on 1-1-1986. We have already extracted the order of this Court dated 6-12-1985 whereby the petitioner was permitted to retire voluntarily from the service of the Registry of the Supreme Court with effect from the forenoon of 1-1-1986. It is true that in view of the proviso to Rule 5(2) of the Rules, the petitioner will not be entitled to any salary for the day on which he actually retired. But, in our opinion, that has no bearing on the question as to the date of retirement. Can it be said that the petitioner retired on 31- 12-1985 ? The answer must be in the negative. Indeed, Mr Anil Dev Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, frankly conceded that the petitioner could not be said to have retired on 31-12-1985. It is also not the case of the respondents that the petitioner had retired from the service of this Court on 31-12-1985. Then it must be held that the petitioner had retired with effect from 1-1-1986 and that is also the order of this Court dated 6-12-1985. It may be that the petitioner had retired with effect from the forenoon of 1-1-1986 as per the said order of this Court, that is to say, as soon as 1-1-1986 had commenced the petitioner retired. But, nevertheless, it has to be said that the petitioner had retired on 1-1-1986 and not on 31-12-1985. In the circumstances, the petitioner comes within the purview of para 17.3 of the recommendations of the Pay Commission”

17. As noticed hereinabove, in the present case, by virtue of the 1st proviso to Rule 56 (a) of the FR, the respondent retired on the afternoon of 31.12.2015. He did not see the light of the day – as a serving Government servant on 01.01.2016. Thus, the decision in S.  Banerjee  (supra)  was clearly not attracted in the facts of the present case.

18. Reliance placed by the respondent on the judgment of the Madras High Court in P. Ayyamperumal (supra) is of no avail. Pertinently, that case did not relate to fixation of the date of retirement – which is the central issue in the present case. A perusal of the order passed in P. Ayyamperumal (supra) shows that the Division Bench accepted the position that the petitioner had completed one full year’s service on 30.06.2013. However, the increment fell due on 01.07.2013 – on which date he was not in service. The Division Bench followed its earlier decision in State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Secretary to Government, Finance Department and Others v. M. Balasubramaniam CDJ 2012 MHC 6525 wherein the Madras High Court had allowed the petition filed by the employee by observing that the employee had completed one full year of service between 01.04.2002 to 31.03.2003, which entitled him to the benefit of increment. The increment accrued to him for the work done during the preceding period of one year.

19. On that premise, the Division Bench in P. Ayyamperumal (supra) held that the petitioner was entitled to one notional increment for the period 01.07.2012 to 30.06.2013. The said increment was directed to be taken into account on the date of his superannuation i.e. 01.07.2013.

20. Firstly, in our view, the said decision in P. Ayyamperumal (supra) was rendered in a materially different fact situation. The issue determined by the Court was not with regard to the date of retirement/ superannuation. In fact, on that aspect, the finding returned by the Madras High Court goes contrary to the submission of the respondent that he retired on 01.01.216, and not 31.12.2015. Secondly, the relief was granted to the petitioner by the Madras High Court since the increment which fell due on 01.07.2013 had been earned by the petitioner by working for the full year i.e. 01.07.2012 to 30.06.2013. The same cannot be said about the revision of pay upon implementation of the Central Pay Commission recommendations. Thirdly, the decision of the Madras High Court has only persuasive value and in the fact of the present case, we do not think that the ratio of the said decision is attracted.

21. So far as the rejection of the Special Leave Petition filed by the Union of India is concerned, the same was by a summary order, and while dismissing the SLP preferred by the Union of India, the Supreme Court observed that it was not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of judicature at Madras on the facts of that case. The Supreme Court did not consider, and did not put its seal of approval on the legal principle involved in P. Ayyamperumal (supra).

22. For all the aforesaid reasons, we allow the present writ petition and set aside the impugned order passed by the Tribunal. We hold that the respondent was not entitled to pay revision with effect from 01.01.2016 under the Seventh Central Pay Commission recommendations since he superannuated on 31.12.2015 and he was not entitled to fixation of his pension on the premise that he retired from service on 01.01.2016. The parties are left to bear their respective costs.

VIPIN SANGHI, J.

A.K. CHAWLA,J .

OCTOBER 23, 2018

high-court-delhi-judgement-in-wp-c-9062-2018-image

Click here to view/download the PDF

The post 7th CPC Pensionary Benefit w.e.f. 01.01.2016 for person retired on superannuation w.e.f. 31.12.2015 not admissible: High Court appeared first on Central Govt Employees - 7th Pay Commission - Staff News.

Merger of Postmaster Cadre (Grade-I, II & III) with General Line (LSG, HSG-II & HSG-I)

$
0
0

Merger of Postmaster Cadre (Grade-I, II & III) with General Line (LSG, HSG-II & HSG-I)

 

No. 25-19/2018-PE-I
Government of India
Ministry of Communications
Department of Posts
(PE-I Section)

Dak Bhawan, Sansad Marg,
New Delhi – 110001
Dated: 31st October, 2019

 

ORDER

This is in continuation of this office Order of even number dated 10.07.2019, which was regarding merger of Postmaster Cadre (Grade-I, II & III) with General line (LSG, HSG-II & HSG-I). In para 3 of merger Order dated 10.07.2019, it was stated that instructions for merger of identified Postmaster Grade POs with other POs shall be issued separately in due course of time.

2. In this regard, this to mention that the Committee constituted to examine the issues relating to the Postmasters Cadre had observed that consequent upon restructuring of Group-C posts of General line, Post Offices earlier headed by LSG officials are now being headed by HSG-II officials. Similarly, Post Offices earlier headed by HSG-II officials are now being headed by HSG-I officials. Therefore, the Committee recommended that the Post Offices currently being headed by Postmaster Grade-I and Postmaster Grade-II may be headed by HSG-II and HSG-I officials respectively after merger. Post Offices currently being headed y Postmaster Grade-III may be headed by HSG- I.

3. Further, this is to mention that the Postmasters Cadre was created/introduced by carving out posts from the existing General Line posts of LSG, HSG-II, and HSG-I and designating them as Postmaster Grade-I, Postmaster Grade-II and Postmaster Grade-III to preferably head HOs, MDGs, offices identified for CBS, major delivery office and major LSG SOs located in prime locations. Now, the Postmaster Cadre (Grade-I , II & III) stands merged with General Line (LSG, HSG-II & HSG-I) and there is a single unified cadre of General Line having LSG, HSG-II & HSG-I level posts.

4. Therefore , the Post Offices which were being headed by Postmaster Grade-I officials should be headed by HSG-II officials, Post Offices which were being headed by Postmaster Grade-II officials should be headed by HSG-I officials and Post Offices which were being headed by Postmaster Grade-III should be headed by HSG-I. However, no new post of HSG-II/HSG¬ I has been created for the purpose.

5. Therefore, it is requested to upgrade the posts of SPMs of Postmaster Grade-I POs to HSG-II,by downgrading equal number of SPM posts of Triple Handed POs and other norm based LSG posts in POs (which were upgraded to HSG-II after Cadre Restructuring of Group C posts) to LSG status. The posts of Postmaster Grade-I(Now LSG) may be redeployed/diverted to Triple Handed POs/LSG posts in POs which shall be downgraded to LSG status for this purpose.

6. Similarly, the posts of SPMs of Postmaster Grade-II POs may b upgrade to HSG-I , by downgrading equal number of HSG-I posts which were upgraded to HSG- I level from HSG-II level after Cadre Restructuring of Group-C posts, preferably in the following order:-

(i) By downgrading the HSG-1 posts available as Dy. PM/APM/AD etc. in the bigger POs where there is more than one HSG-I posts.

(ii) By downgrading other HSG-I posts available in any other Unit/Office having more than one HSG-I posts.

(iii) At last, if sufficient number of posts are not available by exercising above two options, some HSG-I POs may be downgraded to HSG- I level which were upgraded to HSG-I level after Cadre Restructuring of Group C posts.

7. Further, the all the Postmaster Grade-III POs may be designated as HSG-I POs, as the Postmaster Grade-III and HSG-I were same level posts.

8. All the Postmaster Grade POs shall be de-identified and re-designated as per the guidelines given above.

Sd/-
(Smriti Sharan)
Dy. Director General (Estt.)

merger-of-postmaster-cadre

Source: Click here to view/download the PDF

[http://utilities.cept.gov.in/dop/pdfbind.ashx?id=3902]

The post Merger of Postmaster Cadre (Grade-I, II & III) with General Line (LSG, HSG-II & HSG-I) appeared first on Central Govt Employees - 7th Pay Commission - Staff News.

Extension of due date for filing of IT Return/Tax Audit Reports to 30th November, 2019 i.ro. UT of J&K & Ladakh

$
0
0

Extension of due date for filing of IT Return/Tax Audit Reports to 30th November, 2019 i.ro. UT of J&K & Ladakh

 

F. No. 225/306/2019-ITA-ll
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes
*****

North Block, ITA-II Division
New Delhi,the 3st October, 2019

 

Order under Section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961

On consideration of reports of disturbances in internet facility in certain areas of Jammu and Kashmir, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), in exercise of powers conferred under section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’) and in partial modification of CBDT’s order under section 119 of the Act dated 23.07.2019 and 27.09 .2019, hereby further extends the ‘due-date’ for filing of Income tax Returns/Tax Audit Reports to 30th November, 2019 in respect of all categories  of income-tax assessees in the  Union Territory  of Jammu and Kashmir and Union Territory of Ladakh who were/are required to file the  Income-tax Returns/Tax Audit Reports by the due date specified under section 139(1) of the Act read with orders of CBDT under section 119 of the Act dated 23.07.2019 and 27.09.2019.

2. It is also clarified that ITRs filed by the certain categories of income-tax assessees who were required to file ITRs by 31.08.2019, but have filed ITRs after 31.08.2019 till the date of issuance of this order shall be deemed to have been filed within the due date specified under section 139(1) of the Act read with CBDT’s order section 119 of the Act dated 23.07 .2019.

Sd/-
(Rajarajeswari R.)
Under Secretary to the Government of India

extension-of-due-date-for-filing-of-income-tax returns-dated-31-10-2019

Source: Income Tax of India
[https://www.incometaxindia.gov.in/news/extension-of-due-date-for-filing-of-income-tax%20returns-dated-31-10-2019.pdf]

The post Extension of due date for filing of IT Return/Tax Audit Reports to 30th November, 2019 i.ro. UT of J&K & Ladakh appeared first on Central Govt Employees - 7th Pay Commission - Staff News.


Pensioners Life Certificate – How to submit online – Last date 30 November

$
0
0

Pensioners Life Certificate – How to submit online – Last date 30 Nov 2019

life-certificate-last-date-of-submission

Here is how to generate and submit the digital life certificate online

View: JEEVAN PRAMAAN / Digital Life Certificate जीवन प्रमाण/ डिजिटल लाइफ सर्टिफिकेट (डीएलसी): What, How, Where FAQ

The digital life certificate or Jeevan Pramaan Patra is generated with the help of Aadhaar-based biometrics data

NEW DELHI : To continue receiving retirement pension, government pensioners will have to submit a Life Certificate or Jeevan Pramaan Patra by November 30. The window to submit the certificate opened from Friday for those aged below 80.

3 Options for Submission of Life Certificate by Pensioners/Family Pensioners: CPAO’s Guidelines

The offline or the traditional process of getting a life certificate for pension involves a personal visit before pension disbursing agencies like banks, post offices, etc or have the certificate issued by authority where they have served earlier and have it delivered to the disbursing agency.

The traditional process is not only complicated but also but also a time consuming one.

The easier process for pensioners is getting a digital life certificate (DLC) that can be generated online with the help of Aadhaar. There is no requirement to be present personally before the pension disbursing officer nor visit any bank or post office to submit the certificate.

How to submit life certificate for pensioners online:

The government had launched the Aadhaar-based Digital Life Certificate in 2014 which uses the pensioner’s Aadhaar number and biometric data (either iris or fingerprint).

If you are doing it from your home then you need to have an STQC certified biometric device is required for capturing data. If not, then you can go to any Citizen Service Centre (CSC) or the office of pension disbursing agencies.

You need to download the ‘JeevanPramaan Application’ on your PC/mobile phone. The app is also available at the Jeevan Pramaan portal.

The pensioner has to provide Aadhaar number, name, mobile number and self declared pension related information like PPO number, pension account number, bank details, name of pension sanctioning authority, pension disbursing authority, etc. Once the Aadhaar authentication is complete, you can download a PDF copy of the certificate from the Jeevan Pramaan website by providing the Jeevan Pramaan ID.

The digital life certificate is made available to the pension disbursing agency.  Since 2014, 2.6 crore pensioners have used the platform to submit digital life certificates.

The last date for submission of life certificate:

For those aged below 80, life certificate can be submitted in between November 1 and 30. And for senior pensions, aged 80 and above, the department of pension and pensioners’ welfare has allowed them to submit life certificates from October 1 instead of November 1. The deadline remains the same – November 30. If you miss the deadline, pension disbursal is stopped from next month onwards but will be resumed as and when you submit the certificate.

At – https://www.livemint.com/

The post Pensioners Life Certificate – How to submit online – Last date 30 November appeared first on Central Govt Employees - 7th Pay Commission - Staff News.

Emergency treatment in CGHS empanelled Hospitals on credit facility: CGHS OM

$
0
0

Emergency treatment in CGHS empanelled Hospitals on credit facility: CGHS OM

No, S.11011/29/2019-EHS
Government of India
Ministry of Health & Family Welfare
Department of Health & Family Welfare

Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi – 110 108
Dated: the 13th September 2019

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

 

Subject: Emergency treatment in CGHS empanelled Hospitals.

The extant instructions under CGHS provide that under emergency conditions, a CGHS beneficiary can get admission in any CGHS empanelled Hospital without any prior permission. It has, however, been brought to the notice that the Hospitals deny admission or insist on referral memo from CGHS Wellness Centre even in emergency conditions.

In accordance with the Memorandum of Agreement between the CGHS empanelled Hospital and the Government of India, refusal to provide treatment to bonafide CGHS beneficiaries in emergency cases and other eligible categories of beneficiaries on credit basis, without valid ground, would attract disqualification for continuation of empanelment.

It is, therefore, reiterated that in emergency the empanelled hospitals will not refuse admission or demand an advance payment from the CGHS beneficiary or his family member and will provide credit facilities to the patient.

(Rajeev Attri)
Under Secretary to the Govt. of India

emergency-treatment-in-cghs-empanelled-hospital

Source: CGHS Click here to view/download the PDF

The post Emergency treatment in CGHS empanelled Hospitals on credit facility: CGHS OM appeared first on Central Govt Employees - 7th Pay Commission - Staff News.

Revised Dearness Relief from July 2019 Order for Railway pensioners/family pensioners

$
0
0

Revised Dearness Relief from July 2019 Order for Railway pensioners/family pensioners: Railway Board Order RBE No.187/2019

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA (BHARAT SARKAR)
Ministry of Railways (Rail Mantralaya)
(Railway Board)

PC-VII No.:146
RBE No.: 187/2019

File No. PC-VII/2016/1/7/2/3

New Delhi, dated: 31.10.2019

The General Manager/CAOs(R),
All Zonal Railways & Production Units,
(As per mailing list)

Sub: – Grant of Dearness Relief to Railway pensioners/family pensioners — Revised rate effective from 01.07.2019.

A copy of Office Memorandum No. 42/04/2019-P&PW(D) dated 21.10.2019 of Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions (Department of Pension and Pensioners’ Welfare) on the above subject is enclosed herewith for information and compliance. This order shall apply mutatis mutandis on Railways also.

2. This issues with the concurrence of Finance Directorate of the Ministry of Railways.

3. Hindi version is attached below.

Encl. As above.

(Jaya Kumar G)
Deputy Director, Pay Commission-VII
Railway Board

Dearness Relief w.e.f. July, 2019 @17℅ to Central Government pensioners/family pensioners: Order by DoP&PW dt. 21.10.2019

 

railway-pensioner-dearness-relief-july-2019-in-hindiSource: Click here to view/download the PDF

[http://www.indianrailways.gov.in/railwayboard/uploads/directorate/pay_comm/PC7/RBE_187_2019.pdf]

The post Revised Dearness Relief from July 2019 Order for Railway pensioners/family pensioners appeared first on Central Govt Employees - 7th Pay Commission - Staff News.

New CGHS Ayurvedic Dispensary at Pandri, Raipur

$
0
0

New CGHS Ayurvedic Dispensary at Pandri, Raipur under administrative control of Additional Director, CGHS, Nagpur

Govt. of India
Ministry of Health & Family Welfare
Office of the Additional Director
Central Govt. Health Scheme,
Seminary Hills, Nagpur-440006.

No.CGHS/NP/ADMN/Ayush W.C/RP/2019/1873

Date :- 22.10.2019

NOTIFICATION

Subject :- Opening of Ayurvedic dispensary at CGHS Raipur under administrative control of Additional Director, CGHS, Nagpur.

This is for information to all eligible Central Govt. Employees, Pensioners and other stake holders that an Ayurvedic dispensary at Central Govt. Health Scheme (CGHS), Wellness Centre no. 1, Pandri, Raipur is opened under administrative control of Additional Director. CGHS, Nagpur on 22.10.2019 to provide medical facilities to eligible CGHS Card holders.

The timing of CGHS Ayurvedic dispensary, Raipur is from 07 .30 am to 02.00 pm on all working days except on Sundays and gazetted holidays

The address of CGHS Ayurvedic dispensary, Raipur is as follows:

Office of the CMO I/c, CGHS W.C. No. 1, Pandri, Raipur- 492004.

Dr.(Mrs.) Leela B. Pendam
Additional Director
CGHS, Nagpur

notification-ayurvedic-dispensary-at-cghs-raipur

Source: Click here to view/download the PDF

[https://cghs.gov.in/showfile.php?lid=5563]

The post New CGHS Ayurvedic Dispensary at Pandri, Raipur appeared first on Central Govt Employees - 7th Pay Commission - Staff News.

Classification of post of Senior Accounts Officer in Central Civil Accounts Service as Gp A w.e.f. 09.04.2009

$
0
0

Classification of post of Senior Accounts Officer in Central Civil Accounts Service

A-32014/1/2009/Misc/MFCGA(A)/Gr.B/343
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Expenditure
Controller General of Accounts

Mahalekha Niyantrak Bhawan,
‘E’ Block, GPOA Complex, INA,
New Delhi.

Dated : 31-10-2019

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

Subject : Classification of post of Senior Accounts Officer in Central Civil Accounts Service – reg.

In pursuance of Ministry of Finance, Department of Expenditure I.D. Note No. A-12034/7/2017-Ad.I dated 25.10-2019 issued with the approval of Hon’ble Finance Minister, the post of Senior Accounts Officer in Central Civil Accounts Service is classified as Group ‘A’ post w.e.f. 9.4.2009 without any change in Pay Level.

2. All settled cases (such as promotions to the post of Senior Accounts Officer, induction into ICAS, disciplinary cases, etc.) will not be re-opened. The attendant benefits such as consultation with UPSC for promotion, change in disciplinary authority, contribution to CGEGIS etc. will be effective from the date of Issue of order for classifying the post of Senior Accounts Officer as Group ‘A’.

(Suman Bala)
Joint Controller General of Accounts

View: Classification of post of Senior Accounts Officer and Senior Audit Officer from Gp B to Gp A in the IA&AD, O/o CAG: DoE OM

classification-of-senior-accounts-officer-post-in-ccas-cga-order

Source: Click here to view/download the PDF

[http://cga.nic.in//writereaddata/file/GroupAtoSrAOs343Dt31102019.pdf]

The post Classification of post of Senior Accounts Officer in Central Civil Accounts Service as Gp A w.e.f. 09.04.2009 appeared first on Central Govt Employees - 7th Pay Commission - Staff News.

PFRDA Circular: Registration under NPS in case of subscribers who lost their both hands

$
0
0

PFRDA Circular: Registration under NPS in case of subscribers who lost their both hands

PENSION FUND REGULATORY
AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
B-14/A, Chhatrapati Shivaji Bhawan,
Qutub Institutional Area,
Katwaria Sarai, New Delhi-110016
Ph: 011-26517501, 26517503, 26133730
Website: www.pfrda.org.in

CIRCULAR

PFRDA/2019/17/SUP-SG/1

04.10.2019

To,

All Central Government Ministries & Departments/ State Governments
PrAOs, PAOs, CDDOs, NCDDOs – CG Nodal offices
DTAs,DTOs, DDOs – SG Nodal offices
All Central and State Autonomous Bodies
Points of Presence

Subject: Acceptance of CSRF forms or registration under NPS in case of subscriber who has lost both hands

The Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) has received few requests from the Govt Nodal offices, requesting PFRDA to accept the subscriber registration (CSRF) form in case of such subscriber-employees joining under them, who are unable to affix signature on the CSRF form, being due to loss of both hands.

In view of the above and to facilitate the registration of such subscribers under NPS, the Govt Nodal offices/PoPs are advised to accept the subscriber registration (CSRF) form by obtaining the toe impression of the subscriber on the CSRF form. Further, where toe impression of such subscriber who has lost both hands is obtained on the CSRF form, it should be attested by two persons, one of whom should be the official designated to handle NPS related activities in Govt Nodal office/ PoP.

Sd/-
Sumeet Kaur Kapoor
Chief General Manager

registration-under-nps-who-lost-both-hands

Source: Click here to view/download the PDF

The post PFRDA Circular: Registration under NPS in case of subscribers who lost their both hands appeared first on Central Govt Employees - 7th Pay Commission - Staff News.

Latest: One Rank One Pension and issues of concern of Defence Veterans needing urgent resolution – IESM writes to MPs

$
0
0

One Rank One Pension and issues of concern of Defence Veterans needing urgent resolution: IESM writes to MPs

ONE RANK ONE PENSION (OROP) & ISSUES OF CONCERN OF DEFENCE VETERANS NEEDING URGENT RESOLUTION

Dear Veterans,

Letter to Members of Parliament on the above subject dated 02 Nov 2019 is enclosed herewith for your information widest circulation please.
.
With Regards,

Jai Hind,

Yours Sincerely,

Maj Gen Satbir Singh, SM (Retd),
Advisor United Front of Ex Servicemen &
Chairman Indian Ex-Servicemen Movement (IESM)

one-rank-one-pension-iesm-writes-to-mp


Dated:  02 Nov 2019

ONE RANK ONE PENSION (OROP) & ISSUES OF CONCERN OF DEFENCE VETERANS NEEDING URGENT RESOLUTION

Dear Members of Parliament,


1.      We wish to bring to your notice that long pending demand of defence fraternity of OROP has not yet been implemented. Hon’ble Prime Minister and President of BJP Sh. JP Nadda have time and again stated at various forums that OROP has been implemented.  With grievously hurt feelings and anguish, we wish to inform you that such statements by our Hon’ble Prime Minister are of serious concern to us.  Had the OROP been implemented as per the definition stated by MoS Sh. Rao Inderjit Singh on 02 Dec 2014 in the parliament, the Ex Servicemen would not have been on the road across the country protesting for the non-implementation of OROP.  On 31 Oct 2019, Ex Servicemen have completed 1600 days of continuous Protest Movement executed peacefully with dignity, respect and in the best traditions of soldiering.

2.      There are serious anomalies in the Govt of India Min of Def Notification No 12 (I)/2014/D (Pen/Pol)-part –II dated 07 Nov 2015 wherein the Govt is purported to have implemented OROP.  The serious anomalies have been brought to the Notice of the Govt on numerous occasions, but these anomalies have not yet been rectified.  Ex-servicemen were forced to approach Hon’ble Supreme Court for grant of full OROP.  Hon’ble Supreme Court in its order dated 01 May 2019 (copy attached).  Asked the MoD to resolve the anomalies to the extent possible and the next date of hearing was to take place on 06 Aug 2019.  However, the Hon’ble judge hearing the case was busy in hearing Ram Mandir Case and our OROP case hearing was not listed.

3.      In the meantime we had a meeting with Hon’ble Raksha Mantri on 01 Jul 2019 and briefed him about Hon’ble Supreme Court order and requested for the rectification of the OROP anomalies. Hon’ble Raksha Mantri assured us for another meeting after a few days for the resolution of OROP anomalies; however, that meeting has not taken place even after writing to Hon’ble Raksha Mantri a number of times.

4.      During an Election Rally at Chandigarh President of BJP Sh. JP Nadda stated that his Govt had implemented OROP.  The same was denied by Ex-servicemen bodies. To add to our hurt feelings, Hon’ble Prime Minister on 19 Oct 2019 at Rewari in another Election Rally, again stated that his Govt had implemented OROP.  We wish to inform that this is far from truth.  OROP has not been implemented; what has been implement is One Time increase in Pension.  Unless the OROP anomalies are rectified, grant of Full OROP will remain unfulfilled.

5.       We also wish to inform you that equalization of pensions of defence personnel was due with effect from 01 Jul 2019 as per Govt Notification dated 07 Nov 2015, but the same has not yet been carried out. The Govt which had issued the notification has not honored its own order of equalization of Pensions after every five years which became due with effect from 01 Jul 2019. We had through a letter dated 03 Sep 2019 written to Hon’ble Raksha Mantri, copy to Hon’ble Prime Minister and three Chiefs and also forwarded the same letter to Secretary (ESW) requesting for immediate equalization of pensions as notified in Govt Notification dated 07 Nov 2015. MoD, instead of implementing equalization of pensions, ordered another committee whose recommendations have not been made public. The outcome of another, “One Man Judicial Committee (OMJC)” which submitted its report to the Govt on 26 Oct 2016 headed by Justice L. Narasimha Reddy, retired Chief Justice of Patna High Court has neither been made public nor implemented.

6.      We appeal to our elected representative, Hon’ble Members of Parliament to raise our issues of concern in the coming winter session and ask the Govt to grant Full OROP to the defence personnel, a demand which is long pending, though it had been accepted by both NDA and UPA Govts but not yet implemented. Our Hon’ble Member of Parliament, with anguish we wish to say that “any country which does not respect its soldiers is doomed to fail”.

Please grant Justice to Soldiers.

With Regards,

Jai Hind,

Yours Sincerely,

Maj Gen Satbir Singh,
SM (Retd), Advisor United Front of Ex Servicemen &
Chairman Indian Ex-Servicemen Movement (IESM)
Mobile: 9312404269, 01244110570
Email:satbirsm[@]gmail.com
(Source Via e-mail)

http://ex-servicemenwelfare.blogspot.com

The post Latest: One Rank One Pension and issues of concern of Defence Veterans needing urgent resolution – IESM writes to MPs appeared first on Central Govt Employees - 7th Pay Commission - Staff News.


IBA Order Bank DA @ 71.7% for Nov 2019, Dec 2019 and Jan 2020

$
0
0

IBA Order Bank DA @ 71.7% for Nov 2019, Dec 2019 and Jan 2020

Indian Banks’ Association

HR & Industrial Relations

No.CIR/HR&IR/76/D/2019-20/8125
November 1, 2019

All Members of the Association
(Designated Officers)

Dear Sirs,

Dearness Allowance for Workmen and Officer Employees in banks for the months of November, December 2019 & January 2020 under X BPS/ Joint Note dated 25.5.2015

The confirmed All India Average Consumer Price Index Numbers for Industrial Workers (Base 1960=100) for the quarter ended September 2019 are as follows:-

July 2019 – 7281.46
Aug 2019 – 7304.29
Sep 2019 – 7349.94

The average CPI of the above is 7311 and accordingly the number of DA slabs are 717 (7311-4440= 2871/4= 717 Slabs) The last quarterly Payment of DA was at 681 Slabs. Hence there is an increase in DA slabs of 36, i.e 717 Slabs for payment of DA for the quarter Nov. Dec 2019 and January 2020

In terms of clause 7 of the 10th Bipartite Settlement dated 25.05.2015 and clause 3 of the Joint Note dated 25.05.2015, the rate of Dearness Allowance payable to workmen and officer employees for the months of Nov, Dec 2019 & January 2020 shall be 71.7% of ‘pay’. While arriving at dearness allowance payable, decimals from third place may please be ignored.

Yours faithfully,

S.K.Kakkar
Senior Advisor (HR&IR)

Source: Click here to view/download the PDF

The post IBA Order Bank DA @ 71.7% for Nov 2019, Dec 2019 and Jan 2020 appeared first on Central Govt Employees - 7th Pay Commission - Staff News.

Extension of benefit of reservation of EWS in engagement of Trade Apprentice: BPMS writes to PMO

$
0
0

Extension of benefit of reservation of EWS in engagement of Trade Apprentice: BPMS writes to PMO

Bharatiya Pratiraksha Mazdoor Sangh
(AN ALL INDIA FEDERATION OF DEFENCE WORKERS)
(AN INDUSTRIAL UNIT OF B.M.8.)
(RECOGNISED BY MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, GOVT. OF INDIA)
CENTRAL OFFICE : 2-A, NAVIN MARKET, KANPUR-1

REF: BPMS/ PMO/ Apprentices/ 126(7/5/L)

Dated: 30.10.2019

To,

Hon’ble Prime Minister
Govt of India, Prime Minister Office
South Block, Raisina Hills
New Delhi- 110011

Subject: Extension of benefit of reservation of Economically Weaker Sections (EWSs) in engagement of Trade Apprentice.

Respected Sir,

With due regards, your kind attention is invited to the Constitution (One Hundred and Third Amendment) Act, 2019 whereby the State was empowered for making special provision for advancement of any Economically Weaker Sections (EWSs) of citizens.

In line with above provision, reservation to EWSs has been granted in Education and Government Jobs by the Govt.

Further, Trade Apprentice as governed by Apprenticeship Act, 1961 falls neither in the category of Education nor Jobs, but reservations for SC/ ST category and OBC category were provisioned vide Act 27 of 1973 and Act 36 of 2007 respectively. It lacks any provision in the act for Economically Weaker Sections of Society.

This issue was raised before Ministry of Skill Development & Entrepreneurship, Govt of India through Min of Defence but the same was regretted on the plea that EWS reservation is in education and government jobs of India similarly like OBC, SC, ST, whereas apprenticeship training under the Apprenticeship Act, 1961 is neither education nor a government job so EWS reservation is not applicable for it.

In this circumstance, you are requested for making suitable provision for trade apprentices under the Apprenticeship Act, 1961 for extension of benefit of reservation of Economically Weaker Sections.

Thanking you

Sincerely Yours

Sd/-
(MUKESH SINGH)
General Secretary/ BPMS &
Member JCM II Level Council (MoD)

Copy to:

1) The Cabinet Secretary
Govt of India, New Delhi

2) The General Secretary
Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, New Delhi

– With request to take appropriate action

ews-reservation-in-trade-apprentice

Source: http://bpms.org.in/documents/ews-bpms-9k1z.pdf

The post Extension of benefit of reservation of EWS in engagement of Trade Apprentice: BPMS writes to PMO appeared first on Central Govt Employees - 7th Pay Commission - Staff News.

Nine hours work is equal to a normal working day: Centre

$
0
0

Nine hours’ work = a normal working day: Centre

Draft rules prescribe 6 criteria to fix minimum rate of wages, including calorie intake

The Hindu Business Line 4 Nov 2019 SHISHIR SINHA

The Centre has proposed nine hours of works and a net intake of 2,700 calories in a preliminary draft of the Wages (Central) Rules. However, it has not proposed floor wages. The Labour Ministry has invited comments from stakeholders, including the public, which, can be submitted till December 1.

The draft rules prescribe six criteria for the fixation of minimum rate of wages.

They are: The standard working-class family, which includes a spouse and two children apart from the earning worker (an equivalent of three adult consumption units); a net intake of 2,700 calories per day per consumption unit; 66 metres of cloth per year per standard working class family; housing rent expenditure to constitute 10 per cent of food and clothing expenditure; fuel, electricity and other miscellaneous items of expenditure to constitute 20 per cent of the minimum wage; and expenditure for children’s education, medical requirement and recreation, and expenditure on contingencies, to constitute 25 per cent of the minimum wages.

Floor wage

The Centre will constitute a board for the fixation of basic rate of floor wage. The board will suggest minimum living standards taking into various factors. Its recommendations will be circulated among

The standard working class family includes a spouse and two children apart from the earning worker — an equivalent of three adult consumption units

A net intake of 2,700 calories per day per consumption unit 66 metres cloth per year per standard working class family

Housing rent expenditure to constitute 10 per cent of food and clothing expenditure

Fuel, electricity and other miscellaneous expenditure to constitute 20 per cent of minimum wage

Expenditure for children’s education, medical requirements and recreation, and expenditure on contingencies, to constitute 25 per cent of minimum wages

States and, based on their views, the basic floor wage will be fixed.

This basic rate may be revised once in five years. Once the rate of wages for a day is fixed, the amount will be divided by eight for arriving at the per-hour wage, and multiplied by 26 for fixing the permonth rate. There is a proposal on the time interval for the revision of dearness allowance (DA).

Dearness allowance

Here, the draft says that an endeavour will be made such that the cost of living allowance and the cash value of the concession in respect of essential commodities at concession rate are computed before April 1 and October 1 each year to revise the DA payable to employees on minimum wages.

The draft proposes the categorisation of geographical areas into metropolitan, non metropolitan and rural areas. A technical committee will advise the Centre on categorising the occupation of the employees into four: Unskilled, semi-skilled, skilled and highly skilled. The draft has also given the list of occupations to be included in these four categories.

Further, the draft has proposed that nine hours be defined as a normal working day. ‘Night shift’ will refer to an employee working on a shift which extends beyond midnight; a week of night shift would be followed by a ‘whole-day’ holiday.

nine-hours-work-a-normal-working-day-centre

Read more at: The Hindu Business Line

The post Nine hours work is equal to a normal working day: Centre appeared first on Central Govt Employees - 7th Pay Commission - Staff News.

7th Pay Commission Pay Fixation on Promotion/Financial Upgradation – Drawal of increment after 6 months: AIRF writes to Railway Board

$
0
0

7th Pay Commission Pay Fixation on Promotion/Financial Upgradation – Drawal of next increment after 6 months : AIRF writes to Railway Board

Ministry of Finance, Deptt. of Expenditure (Government of India) vide their O.M. No.4-21/2017-IC/E.IIIA dated 29.10.2019(copy enclosed) has clarified that the employees who are getting promotion/financial upgradation on 1st July and receiving benefit of two increments(1st annual increment due on 1st July and the 2nd notional increment on account of promotion) will accrue their subsequent increment on the following 1st January after completion of six months period……

7th Pay Commission – DNI after promotion/financial upgradation: Clarification on Rule 10 of CCS RP Rules, 2016

A.I.R.F.
All India Railwaymen’s Federation

No.AIRF/405(VII CPC)

Dated: October 31, 2019

The Secretary(E),
Railway Board,
New Delhi

Dear Sir,

Sub: Drawal of Next Increment Under Rule 10 of the CCS(RP) Rules, 2016 – Reg.

Ministry of Finance, Deptt. of Expenditure(Government of India) vide their O.M. No.4-21/2017-IC/E.IIIA dated 29.10.2019(copy enclosed) has clarified that the employees who are getting promotion/financial upgradation on 1st July and receiving benefit of two increments(1st annual increment due on 1st July and the 2nd notional increment on account of promotion) will accrue their subsequent increment on the following 1st January after completion of six months period.

Board are, therefore, requested to circulate the above-cited Office Memorandum of the MoF(Deptt. of Exp.) to the General Managers of all the Zonal Railways and Productions, duly implementing these orders of the Ministry of Finance; contained in their O.M. supra dated 29.10.2019.

An early action in the matter shall be highly appreciated.

Yours faithfully,

Sd/-
(Shiva Gopal Mishra)
General Secretary

Encl: As above

Copy to: GSs, all affiliated unions – for information.

drawal-of-next-increment-under-rule-10-ccs-pay-rules-2016-airf-writes-to-railway-board

Source: http://www.airfindia.org/2019/11/05/drawal-of-next-increment-under-rule-10-of-the-ccsrp-rules-2016-reg/

The post 7th Pay Commission Pay Fixation on Promotion/Financial Upgradation – Drawal of increment after 6 months: AIRF writes to Railway Board appeared first on Central Govt Employees - 7th Pay Commission - Staff News.

MTNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme – 2019: Objective, Eligibility, Benefit & Sample Application Form

$
0
0

MTNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme – 2019: Objective, Eligibility, Benefit & Sample Application Form

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd.
(A Government of India Enterprise)
CIN: L32101DLl 986GOI023501

MTNL/CO/ GM(HR)NRS/NE/2016-17
4th Nov., 2019

OFFICE ORDER

Sub.:MTNL VOLUNTARY RETIREMENT SCHEME-2019

In pursuance of the DoT OM No. 30-04/ 2019- PSU Affairs dtd. 29th October 2019 and the decision of Board of Directors in MTNL through Circular Resolution on-04.11.2019, the MTNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme- 2019 is hereby introduced with effect from 04.11.2019 and it shall remain in force till the 5:30 PM of 03.12.2019.

The details of the Scheme are enclosed for necessary action.

General Manager (HR & Legal)

To,
Executive Director
MTNL, Delhi/ Mumbai

Copy to:-

  1. Chairman, Telecom Commission, DoT
  2. Additional Secretary (T) DoT
  3. CMD, MTNL I CMD, BSNL I CMD, TCIL I CMD, ITI
  4. All Board of Directors, MTNL
  5. Secretary (OPE)
  6. Member (Services) I Member (Finance), DoT
  7. Sr. DDG(Estd) I Sr. DDG(SU) – DoT
  8. GM(Finance) CO/ DU/MU.
  9. GM(Admn.), Delhi/ Mumbai – For wide circulation and n/a
  10. Company Secretary
  11. DD(OL) for arranging Hindi Translation of the Scheme
  12. GS of Majority Union DU/ MU.
  13. Spare Copy

VOLUNTARY RETIREMENT SCHEME FOR MTNL EMPLOYEES

1. SHORT TITLE

This scheme shall be called the ‘MTNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme -­2019’.

2. OBJECTIVE

The scheme aims at optimising and right-­sizing of Human Resource of MTNL by providing attractive benefits to the eligible employees opting for voluntarily retiring before the normal date of superannuation.

3. DEFINITIONS

In this scheme, unless the context otherwise requires,

(a) “Absorbed employee” means a Government servant permanently absorbed in MTNL.

(b) “Controlling Officer” means the officer of the rank of SDE/Dy. Manager (or equivalent) or above under whom the employee is posted.

(c) “Competent Authority” means appointing authority for respective category of employee as per rules of MTNL.

(d) “Date of Superannuation” for purpose of this scheme means the date of Superannuation as per existing rules considering 60 years as the age of superannuation.

(e) “Direct Recruitee” means an employee directly recruited by MTNL on or after 01.04.1986.

(f) “Effective date of Voluntary retirement” means the date as stated in Clause 4.

(g) “Eligible Employee” means an employee who is eligible to opt for voluntary retirement as per the eligibility criteria of this Scheme as defined in Clause 5 and shall include all eligible MTNL employees on deputation to other organisation or posted outside MTNL on loan basis on the date of notification of the Scheme.

(h) “Existing Rules” means MTNL Rules in force as on the date of notification of this Scheme or GoI Rules as applicable to MTNL employees.

(i) “Family” means family as defined in the CCS Pension Rules, 1972.

(j) “Salary” means Basic Pay plus Dearness allowance thereon as applicable on the effective date of Voluntary retirement.

(k) “Service” means the length of qualifying service for the purpose of CCS Pension Rules 1972 and further as defined in clause 6 of this scheme for respective category of employee(s).

(l) “Scheme” means ‘MTNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme -­2019’.

4. OPERATION OF THE SCHEME:

The effective date of Voluntary Retirement under this scheme shall be 31-­01-­ 2020.The Scheme shall come into force from the date of issue of notification inviting option for voluntary retirement under the scheme and shall remain in operation as per the dates mentioned below:

(a) Date of start of option: 04-­11-­2019
(b) Date of closing of option: 03-­12-­2019 up to 05:30PM.

For Filling On line Application Form Please Contact your controlling unit. Sample Form attached.

5. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA:

All regular and permanent employees (both absorbed employees and direct recruits) of MTNL, including those on deputation to other organisation or posted outside MTNL on loan/informal/deputation basis on the date of notification of the option for voluntary retirement under the Scheme, who has attained the age of 50 years or above as on the notified effective date of voluntary retirement scheme shall be eligible to seek voluntary retirement under this Scheme.

Explanation: Employees belonging to the following categories shall not be eligible to seek voluntary retirement under the Scheme:

(i) Government employees/ employees of other organisations working in MTNL on deputation/ deemed deputation/ loan basis.

(ii) Employees whose services are permanently transferred in public interest to Central/ State Government/ Autonomous Bodies/ Public Sector Undertakings or other entities.

(iii) Employees permanently absorbed in other organisation before the Scheme comes into force.

(iv) Casual Workers and Contractual employees.

(v) Employees retired/ retiring on superannuation/ resigned from service/ voluntarily retired under existing rules on or before effective date of voluntary retirement notified under the Scheme.

6. BENEFITS
An eligible employee(s) voluntarily retiring under the Scheme shall be entitled to the following benefits and no other benefits:

6.1 Lump-­sum compensation or Ex-­Gratia

(a) The amount of Ex-­Gratia for any eligible employee will be equal to 35 days salary of such employee for each completed year of service plus 25 days salary of such employee for every year of service left, until superannuation.

Provided further that this Ex-­Gratia compensation shall not exceed the sum of salary that such employee would draw at the existing level (i.e. Basic Pay plus Dearness Allowance on the effective date of Voluntary retirement) during the service period left till superannuation from the effective date of VRS.

Provided further that this Ex-­Gratia compensation shall be subject to provisions in clause 6.1(c) & 6.1(d).

(b) For the purpose of calculation, the salary per day shall be equal to monthly salary of such employee divided by 30 days. For fraction of a year of service rendered / left, calculation of Ex-­Gratia will be made on pro-­rata basis.

(c) Payment of Ex-­gratia to combined service pensioners absorbed in MTNL under rule 37A: The amount of Ex-­Gratia payable to the eligible employee(s) entitled to pension for combined service rendered in DoT and MTNL under Rule 37-­A of CCS Pension Rules, 1972 shall be further restricted to the amount which would be ascertained after taking together with total amount of pension (Basic Pension without commutation plus Dearness Relief as on the date following the effective date of voluntary retirement) that such eligible employee would be drawing for the balance period left till date of superannuation.

In case of employees regularised through Temporary Status Mazdoor (TSM) Scheme, for ex-­gratia calculation, 50% of their total length of service as TSM will be counted.

Provided further that amount of Ex-­Gratia payable to the eligible employee(s) does not exceed 125% of the sum of salary at prevailing level that the employee would have drawn till superannuation from the effective date of VRS.

(d) Payment of Ex-­gratia to Pro-­rata service. : In respect of those employees who had opted for Government pension for the period of service rendered in DoT prior to their absorption in MTNL and are already getting pro-­rata pension from GOI, the ex-­gratia amount to the eligible employee shall be calculated based on combined qualifying service rendered in Central Government and MTNL and shall not exceed the ex-­ gratia receivable by the similarly placed combined service pensioners (in terms of years of service completed and remaining). The Ex-­gratia for eligible absorbed Pro-­rata pensioners shall be calculated by taking their pension notionally as applicable for combined service pensioners having same years of service completed and remaining, taking into account entire service in GoI and MTNL.

In case of employees regularised through Temporary Status Mazdoor (TSM) Scheme, for ex-­gratia calculation, 50% of their total length of service as TSM will be counted.

(e) Payment of Ex-­gratia to Direct Recruit Employees, recruited by MTNL on or after 01.04.1986 including appointed under Rule 37: In respect of the employee(s) directly recruited by MTNL on or after 01.04.1986, the amount of Ex-­gratia will be calculated in terms of para 6.1 (a) and (b) for the service rendered after their appointment in MTNL.

Provided further that the provision with respect to further restricting the Ex-­ Gratia as per clause 6.1 (c) and 6.1 (d) shall not apply in the case(s) of said employee(s).

(f) An employee retiring voluntarily under the scheme shall be paid the amount of Ex-­gratia in two equal instalments of 50% each. The first instalment shall be paid in FY 2019-­20 and the second instalment in first quarter of FY 2020-­21.

(g) Payment of the amount of Ex-­Gratia and gratuity shall be subject to recovery of dues outstanding against the employee and deduction of tax at source as per provisions of Income Tax Act, 1961 in force on the date of payment.

6.2 TERMINAL BENEFITS:

In addition to the lump-­sum compensation or the amount of Ex-­gratia as per Clause 6.1 of the Scheme, the employee(s) voluntarily retiring under the Scheme shall be entitled to terminal and other benefits, as applicable to the said employee(s) under existing rules. The payment of such benefits shall be made in the following manner:

(a) Pension/ Family pension: The employee(s) retiring under the Scheme shall be entitled to Pension/ Family pension, as applicable, with effect from the date following the effective date of voluntary retirement and shall be authorised as per existing procedure.

Provided that the employee(s) governed by the EPF and Miscellaneous Provisions Act 1952 and EPS 1995, the pension shall be administered as per applicable rules.

(b) Retirement Gratuity :

(i) Payment of deferred Gratuity to employee(s) who opted for combined service pension and were absorbed in MTNL under rule 37A: The gratuity payable to the employee(s) who were absorbed from Central Government to MTNL and opted for Combined Service Pension, shall be calculated based on combined qualifying service rendered in Central Government and MTNL, till the effective date of voluntary retirement:

Provided that for the employee(s) who have attained more than 55 years the age on the effective date of Voluntary retirement, the payment of gratuity will be made after such employee attains the age of 60 years (superannuation age on the date of offer of VRS):

Provided that such payment of gratuity shall be made within one month from date of attaining 60 years.

Provided further that for the employees currently aged 55 years or less, on the effective date of Voluntary retirement, the gratuity shall be paid in month of February, 2025.

(ii) Payment of Gratuity to Pro-­rata service pensioners. : Gratuity payable to the employees who took absorption from Government to MTNL and opted for pro-­rata Service Pension shall be calculated based on qualifying service rendered in the MTNL till the date of voluntary retirement.

The gratuity shall be paid to these employee(s) by MTNL after voluntary retirement under this scheme without any deferment and within the existing prescribed time limit as per existing rules and procedures applicable to them.

(iii) Payment of Gratuity to directly recruited employee and those appointed under Rule 37: The gratuity payable to the employee(s) directly recruited by MTNL, shall be calculated based on qualifying service rendered after their appointment in the MTNL till the date of voluntary retirement:

Provided that the service rendered in previous organisation(s) before joining MTNL by such employee(s) shall not be taken into account for calculation of Gratuity benefit.

Provided that the gratuity shall be paid to such employee(s) by MTNL after voluntary retirement under this scheme without any deferment and within the existing prescribed time limit as per existing rules and procedures applicable to them.

(iv) Simple interest at the prevailing GPF rates (currently 7.9%), from the date of voluntary retirement under this scheme till the gratuity is released, shall be paid on the deferred gratuity amount for employees covered under clause 6.2 (b) (i).

(v) In the event of death of the employee(s) retired under the Scheme before the due date of payment, the deferred gratuity amount will be released immediately to the family of such pensioner or to the nominee/ legal heir (in the absence of family pensioner), as the case may be, along with applicable interest till the date of payment as per Clause 6(b) (iv) of this Scheme.

(vi) The amount of Gratuity payable to the employee on the effective date of voluntary retirement under the scheme shall be communicated to the employee by the concerned pension sanctioning authority.

(c) Commutation of Pension:

The absorbed employees who have attained more than 55 years of age on the effective date of voluntary retirement and had opted for pension on the basis of combined service in DOT and MTNL, on opting for voluntary retirement, will be eligible for commutation of pension only when such employee(s) attains the age of 60 years (superannuation age on the date of offer of VRS).

Provided that other employees currently aged 55 years or less, on the effective date of voluntary retirement, the commutation of pension shall be permitted with effect from 01-­02-­2025, in partial relaxation to extant rules of CCS (Commutation of pension) Rules, 1981. For commutation of pension, the retired employee will be required to make an application to the pension sanctioning authority as per the rules prevailing at that time.

Provided that till the employee opts for commutation of pension, he/ she shall be paid full pension amount as admissible.

Once employee(s) becomes eligible for pension commutation as per above guidelines, commutation of pension shall be governed by the CCS (Commutation of pension) Rules, 1981 and such employee(s) shall be eligible for commutation of pension without submission of medical fitness certificate up to one year from the date of becoming eligible for commutation.

Provided further that on producing medical fitness certificate beyond one year, the commutation factor shall be applicable as per age of such employee(s) on date of commutation.

(d) Encashment of Earned Leave/ Half Pay Leave: The employee(s) retired under the Scheme shall be entitled to ‘Encashment of Earned Leave/ Half Pay Leave’ as per existing rules of MTNL.

(e) TA/ DA for journey to place of settlement after Voluntary retirement: The employee(s) retired under this Scheme shall be entitled to TA/ DA for journey to the place of settlement as per existing rules.

(f) Retention of staff quarter: The employee(s) retiring under the Scheme shall be entitled to retention of staff quarter as per existing rules, as amended from time to time.

(g) Other Facilities/ entitlements (Residential Telephone Connection, Post-­ retirement medical facilities etc.) shall be governed by the existing rules and procedures, as amended from time to time.

7. PROCEDURE:

(i) Eligible employee(s) shall be required to submit option to voluntarily retire from service under the Scheme during the prescribed period and as per the procedure prescribed in the scheme.

(ii) The VRS option of employee(s) facing Departmental / Judicial proceedings shall be accepted. Leave encashment, Transfer grant, GPF/ CPF and pension as applicable will be released provisionally as per Rule 69 of CCS Pension Rule 1972.

Provided that the payment of Ex-­gratia and Gratuity, shall be released only on the conclusion of and based on, the outcome of Departmental/ Judicial proceedings.

(iii) The option once exercised under this Scheme shall be final and decision of the competent authority shall be binding on the concerned employee(s).

Provided that the employee(s) will be allowed to withdraw the option only once at any time, till the closing time and date of option.

Provided further that the request for withdrawal of option shall be submitted online along with signed copy in writing.

(iv) The authority for acceptance of option under this scheme shall be the competent authority as defined in clause 3(c).

8. GENERAL CONDITIONS:

(i) The Scheme is not negotiable and shall not be a subject matter of any industrial dispute.

(ii) There shall be no recruitment in MTNL against the posts falling vacant on account of voluntary retirement under the Scheme, and these posts will be abolished.

(iii) The employee(s) retired under this Scheme, shall not be eligible for Re-­ employment in any other CPSE.

Provided that in case any employee desires to take up re-­employment in any CPSE, such employee shall have to refund the entire amount of ex-­ gratia received under the Scheme to MTNL before joining such CPSE. MTNL shall remit the refunded amount to the government.

(iv) All payments under the scheme and any other benefit payable to an employee(s) by MTNL shall be subject to prior settlement/re-­payment in full of loans, advances, returning of property and any other dues payable by such employee(s) to MTNL.

Provided that such employee can give an option to settle the pending dues to MTNL from the amount of payment under Ex-­gratia, Gratuity or other retirement benefits.

(v) In the event of the death of an employee after submission of option but before the effective date of voluntary retirement under this Scheme, the amount of Ex-­gratia payment shall not be released to the family / legal heirs of deceased employee:

Provided that other retirement benefits as applicable according to the existing rules, shall be paid to the family / legal heirs.

(vi) All payments made under the scheme shall be subject to deduction of tax at source as per Income Tax Act 1961 wherever applicable.

(vii) The Competent Authority shall have absolute discretion either to accept or reject the request of an employee seeking Voluntary Retirement under the scheme without assigning any reasons.

(viii) The benefits payable under this scheme shall be in full and final settlement of all claims of whatsoever nature, whether arising under the scheme or otherwise.

(ix) An employee who voluntarily retires under this scheme or his/ her family or legal heirs shall have no claim or compensation except the benefits under the Scheme.

9. In case of any doubt or ambiguity over the meaning / interpretation of any of the terms of this scheme, the decision of CMD MTNL shall be final and binding.

mtnl-vrs-scheme-sample-application-form-page-1 mtnl-vrs-scheme-sample-application-form-page-3 mtnl-vrs-scheme-sample-application-form-page-2

Source: Click here to view/download the PDF

The post MTNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme – 2019: Objective, Eligibility, Benefit & Sample Application Form appeared first on Central Govt Employees - 7th Pay Commission - Staff News.

Viewing all 16216 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>