Quantcast
Channel: Central Govt Employees News – 8th Pay Commission – Staff News
Viewing all 16271 articles
Browse latest View live

Minimum prescribed educational qualification for direct recruitment to the post of Technician Grade III in Level-2 of Pay Matrix of 7th CPC

$
0
0
Minimum prescribed educational qualification for direct recruitment to the post of Technician Grade III in Level-2 of Pay Matrix of 7th CPC

Government of India (Bharat Sarkar)
Ministry of Railways (Rail Mantralaya)
(Railway Board) 
RBE No. 13/19

No. E(NG)II/2018/RR-1/51 
New Delhi, dated 16.01.2019.

The General Manager (P),
All Indian Railways/PUs
Chairmen, Railway Recruitment Boards (RRBs).

Sub: Minimum prescribed educational qualification for direct recruitment to the post of Technician Grade III in Level-2 of Pay Matrix of 7th CPC.

Ref: Railway Board's letter No. E(NG)II/2001/RR-1/6 dated 3.8.2001.

Attention is invited to instructions under reference prescribing, inter-alia, minimum educational qualification for open market recruitment to the post of Technician Grade-III in Level -2 of Pay Matrix of 7th CPC as under:

“Act Apprenticeship/ITI in relevant trade”.

Diploma in Engineering should not be considered as an alternative higher qualification. Act Apprenticeship/ITI in relevant trade is the only qualification and no other qualification including Diploma in Engineering should be accepted as an alternative qualification on the ground of being a higher qualification in the same line of training.

2. The inclusion of the Trade of Operator Advanced Machine Tool as an eligibility qualification for the post of Technician Grade III has been under consideration of this Ministry. Accordingly, it has been examined in consultation with the technical directorates of this Ministry and it has been decided by the Board to include the Trade of Operator Advanced Machine Tool as eligibility qualification for the posts as identified and mentioned below:

(a) Tech Gr IT (EMU)

(b) Tech Gr.III Machinist (C&W)

(c) Tech Gr.III Machinist (Workshop)

(d) Tech Gr.III Mechanical (PUs)

(e) Tech Gr.III Turner (Workshop)

3. These instructions will be applicable from the date of issue of this letter.  Cases already under process will continue to be dealt in terms of earlier instructions.

4. Please acknowledge receipt.

Sd/-
(M.M. Rai)
Jt. Director Estt.(N)II
Railway Board

Source: Click here to view/download the PDF

[http://www.indianrailways.gov.in/railwayboard/uploads/directorate/establishment/ENG-II/2019/RBE_13_160119.pdf]

PCDA Circular 208: Points and Clarification on Common Errors being noticed or brought to the notice by pensioners/family pensioners or PDAs etc.

$
0
0
PCDA Circular 208: Points and Clarification on Common Errors being noticed or brought to the notice by pensioners/family pensioners or PDAs etc.

O/o the Principal Controller of Defence Accounts (Pension)
Draupadighat, Allahabad 0 211014

Circular No. 208
No. AT/Tech/70-Vol. XXVI 
Dated: 25/01/2019 

To
1. The Chief Accountant, RBI Deptt. of Govt. Bank Accounts, Central office C-7, Second Floor, Bandre- Kurla Complex, P B No. 8143, Bandre East, Mumbai-400051
2. The Director of Treasuries of all State……………
3. The Manager CPPC of Public Sector Banks including IDBI
4. The CDA (PD) Meerut
5. The CDA, Chennai
6. The Nodal Officers (ICICI/AXIS/HDFC Bank)….
7. The Pay & Accounts Officer……………
8. The Military. & Air Attache, Indian
9. Embassy, Kathmandu, Nepal 10. The D.P.D.O…………………….
11. Post Master, Kathua (J & K) and Camp Bell Bay

Sub: Common errors being noticed in screen audit/spot audit or brought to the notice of this office by the pensioners/family pensioners or PDAs etc.
There are various common errors being noticed during Screen Audit/Spot Audit conducted by this office or brought to the notice of this office by the pensioners/family pensioners or Pension Disbursing Agencies (PDAs) etc. Hence, competent authority has decided to issue a comprehensive circular highlighting the common errors being noticed during Screen Audit/Spot Audit conducted by this office or brought to the notice of this office by pensioners/family pensioners or PDAs etc. along with corrective measures required to be taken by the PDAs to avoid the recurrence of similar irregularities in future.
[post_ads]
2. Common errors and the corrective measures required to be taken by the PDAs to avoid the recurrence of irregularities in future are as below:

Sl.No.
Commonerrors
(i)Release of withheld amount of gratuity/DCRG
(ii)Restoration of Commuted Portion of Pension after 15 years of retirement
(iii)Payment of Fixed Medical Allowance
(iv)Payment of Enhanced Rate of Ordinary Family Pension
(v)Payment of Additional quantum of pension/family pension to pensioners/family pensioners of 80 years of age and above
(vi)Payment of Dearness Relief on pension/family pension
(vii)Payment of dearness relief during re-employment of pensioners/family pensioners
(viii)Compensation by the Agency Banks for delay in crediting pension/family pension/arrear thereof.

3. Necessary instructions for the above common errors have already been issued vide this office Circular No. 165 dated 22/02/2013. Circular No. 200 dated 12/04/2018 has also been issued to regulate payment of dearness relief on pension during re-employment of pensioners/family pensioners.
[post_ads_2]
  1. Apart from the above, following common errors are also being noticed and corrective measures required to be taken is appended below:

Sl.
No.
Points/Clarification
(i)PointRevisionof pension of pre-2006 Pensioners/family pensioners who retired as NCC Whole Time Officers and MNS (Local)
Clarification
It has come to the notice of this office that some of the PDAs have revised pension of NCC Whole Time Officers treating as Commissioned Officers of the armed forces instead of civilian pensioners under 6th CPC effective from 01/01/2006.

In this regard, it is stated that although NCC Whole Time Officers have rank/designation like Lieutenant, Captain, Major and Lt. Col similar to pensioners in the Army and equivalent ranks/designations in Navy/Air Force of Armed Forces, but pension of the NCC Whole Time Officers is sanctioned/revised treating as civilian pensioners and in their cases PPO is issued in ‘C’ series by this office. Their pension under 6th CPC is required to be firstly revised as per this office Circular No. 57 dated 17/09/2008. Pension so revised as per Circular No. 57 is required to be compared with modified parity as per this office Circular No. C-167 dated 21/06/2017. Revised pension whichever beneficial under Circular No. 57 and Circular No. C-167 is required to be payable w.e.f. 01/01/2006 in the case NCC Whole Time Officers.

However, pension of MNS (Local) is required to be revised as per this office Circular No. 57 dated 17/09/2008, Circular No. 102 dated 11/02/2013, Circular No. C-144 dated 14/08/2015 and Circular No. C-149 dated 08/04/2016 as amended time to time.
(ii)PointWrongrevisionof pension of Reservist pensioners.
ClarificationIt has been observed that pension of some of the Reservist pensioners has been revised treating rank of the pensioners as Sepoy or otherwise. In this context, it is intimated that such type of pensioners are entitled for revised pension @ Rs. 3,500/- per month
w.e.f. 01/01/2006 under 6th CPC and @ Rs. 9,000/- per month
w.e.f. 01/01/2016 under 7th CPC. In case, the rank of the pensioner is shown as Reservist in the original PPO/Corr. PPO, but rank has been shown as Sepoy or otherwise in corrigendum PPO issued under 6th CPC series “S/Corr/6th CPC….”, in such situation pension of the pensioner is required to be revised for the rank of Reservist and matter may be referred to this office for clarification/necessary action in regard to rank of the pensioner.
(iii)PointPaymentof family pension without notification of name of family pensioner through PPO/Corrigendum PPO.
Clarification
It has been observed that some of the individuals are being paid family pension without notification of his/her name in the PPO/Corrigendum PPO. Therefore, it is advised that such type of individuals are not entitled for family pension without notification of his/her name in the PPO/Corrigendum PPO. In such cases, the individual may be advised to approach deceased pensioner’s Service HQrs/Records Office/Head of the Office as the case may be for processing of the claim for notification of the name for family pension by the Pension Sanctioning Authority (PSA).

In case, the name of the family pensioner has not been notified in the original PPO/Corr. PPO, but the name of the family pensioner has erroneously been shown in the corrigendum PPO issued under 6th CPC, in such situation, the name of the family pensioner is not required to be considered for family pension and the claimant may advised to contact concerned Service HQrs/Records Office/Head of the Office as the case may be for processing of the claim for notification of the name for family pension by the Pension Sanctioning Authority (PSA).
(iv)PointRevisionof pension in respect of Post-2006 Havildars granted ACP-Iwholateronpromotedto the Rank of Hony Nb Sub.
ClarificationIt is clarified that pension of Post-2006 Havildars granted ACP-I, who got pensionary benefits of Nb-Sub rank but later on promoted to the rank of Hony. Nb-Sub for which Corr. PPOs were issued revising the rank as Hony. Nb-Sub. Pension in such cases shall be revised for the rank of Nb-Sub as per One Rank One Pension (OROP) referring this office Circular No. 555 dated 04/02/2016.
(v)PointRevisionof pension under as per One Rank One Pension (OROP) in respect of Fly. Sergeant.
ClarificationThe rank of Fly. Sergeant has not been mentioned in the equivalence of ranks in Appendix – ‘Y’ of this office Circular No. 555 dated 04.02.2016 & Circular No. 557 dated 17.03.2016. In this regard, it is clarified that rank of Fly. Sergeant is equivalent to JWO of the Air Force and Naib Subedar of the Army. Hence, pension of Fly. Sergeant shall be revised from the Tables of Naib Subedar as per One Rank One Pension (OROP) referring this office Circular No. 555 dated 04/02/2016.
(vi)PointNon-paymentof correct rate of monetary allowance attachedwith Gallantry Awards.
ClarificationRepresentations are being received in this office that Monetary Allowances attached to pre and post independence Gallantry Awards has not been revised w.e.f. 01/08/2017. During audit of pension payment scrolls of the Pension Disbursing Authorities (PDAs), this office has also observed that in some of the cases, the Monetary Allowances attached to pre and post independence Gallantry Awards has not been revised w.e.f. 01/08/2017 as per this office Circular No. 30 dated 22/12/2017. Therefore, it is requested to the PDAs that the Monetary Allowances attached to pre and post independence Gallantry Awards may be revised w.e.f. 01/08/2017 as per this office Circular No. 30 dated 22/12/2017.
(vii)PointNon-restrictionof pension as per terms of engagement.
ClarificationIn some cases, it has been observed that pension as per One Rank One Pension (OROP) referring this office Circular No. 555 dated 04/02/2016 has not been revised for the actual qualifying service subject to the maximum term of engagement for each rank as applicable from time to time as per Appendix-X of the ibid circular as amended time to time. Therefore, PDAs are requested to revise the pension as per the tables enclosed with the ibid circular after ascertaining the actual qualifying service subject to the maximum term of engagement for each rank as applicable from time to time.
(viii)PointRounding of qualifying service.
Clarification
While calculating the length of qualifying service for the pensionary benefits, a fraction of a year equal to 3 months and above but less than 9 months is treated as one half (1/2) year period, and nine months or more but less than a year is treated as a completed one year for determining the amount of pension w.e.f. 28/06/1983. Prior to 28/06/1983, the broken period of service of 180 days or more is to be treated as ½ years w.e.f. 22/04/1960.

Accordingly, fraction of a year is required be rounded of as per following table:

Period
Rounding of
Prior to 22/04/1960 Fraction of a year is ignored.
22/04/1960 27/06/1983 Fraction of a year of 180 days or more is to be treated as ½ years.
28/06/1983 Onwards Fraction of a year equal to 3 months and above but less than 9 months is treated as half (1/2) year period and nine months or more but less than a year is treated as a completed one year
In view of above, if qualifying service has been mentioned as 17 years 10 months in PPO/Corr PPO, it should be rounded upto 18 years for post 28.06.1983 retirees, 17.5 years for pre-28.6.1983 but post 22.04.1960 and 17 years for pre-22.04.1960 retirees.
(ix)PointIncorrectrevision of Liberalised Family Pension (LFP) and SpecialFamilyPension(SFP).
Clarification
Some of the family pensioners are representing to this office that type of family pension sanctioned to his/her has not been correctly revised by the PDAs. The matters have also been examined in this office with the Pension Payment Scrolls of the PDAs available in this office and it has been observed that in some of the cases, the family pensioners are not being paid correct rate of revised family pension for which family pensioner is entitled. For example: In some of the cases, it has also been observed that although the family pensioners are entitled for LFP or SFP, but the family pensioner is being paid ordinary rate of family pension. Therefore, it is advised to the PDAs that family pension may be revised for the type of pension she/he is entitled for.
 (x)PointNon revision of pension as per rank of the pensioner.
Clarification
It has been observed that in some of the cases, the pension of the pensioner has not been revised as per the rank of the pensioner for which the pensioner is entitled. For example: Pension of Commissioned officer of the rank of Lt. Cdr. in Navy which is equivalent to Major in Army and Sqn Ldr. in Air Force is being paid pension for the rank of Lt. Col. of Army as per One Rank One Pension (OROP) referring this office Circular No. 555 dated 04/02/2016. Therefore, it is advised to the PDA that pension may be revised after confirming the equivalent rank as mentioned in Appendix-Y of Circular No. 555.
(xi)PointNon-revisionof pension of Commissioned Officers as per thecorps/categoriesof pensioners.
Clarification
The pension of the Commissioned Officers is required to be revised as perthe corps/categories of the officers mentioned in the PPO/Corrigendum PPO issued by the Pension Sanctioning Authority. In case of Army Officers, the corps/categories are identified from the prefix attached to their personnel no. The prefix and corresponding category of officers are mentioned as under-
Prefixattachedwith Personnel No. CategoryofpensionersofCommissionedofficers
IC, SL, SC, RC Regular Commissioned officers
MR Officers of Army Medical Corps
DR Officers of Army Dental Corps
V Officers of Remount Veterinary Corps
TA Officers of Territorial Army
NR Officers of MNS
NTR Non-technical Officers of Army Medical Corps
EC Emergency Service Commissioned Officers
SS Short Service Commissioned Officers.
The non-technical officers of Army Medical Corps are entitled to pension/family pension for regular Army officers and not as per AMC/ADC/RVC.
(xii)PointWrong payment of double service element of pension for a serviceforwhichpensionerhasbeensanctionedWarInjuryPension.
Clarification
In some of the cases, it has been observed that War Injury Pension consisting of service element and war injury element has been sanctioned as a single amount under “D/BC” series by the Pension Sanctioning Authority. In such type of PPOs, service pension/element already sanctioned under “S” series has either been held in abeyance or cancelled. But, during audit of pension disbursed by the PDA, it has been observed that the pensioner is being paid service pension under “D/BC” series as well as “S” series which causes over payment of pension.
(xiii)PointEnhancementof amount of Ex-Gratia payable to Reservists andfamilies of Reservists.
Clarification
The existing amount of ex-gratia of Rs. 600/- per month being paid to reservists and the amount of ex-gratia of Rs. 605/- per month being paid to dependents members of families i.e. widow and dependents children of deceased beneficiaries has been revised w.e.f. 4th June 2013 vide this office Circular No. 521dated 30/12/2013 at the following rates:
Kind of recipients Enhanced amount of basic monthly ex-gratia
Reservists Rs. 750/-
Widows and dependent children of the deceased Reservists Rs. 645/-

Dearness ex-gratia equal to 50% of the enhanced amount of ex- gratia and Dearness Relief, as notified from time to time, on the sums of the enhanced amounts of ex-gratia and dearness ex-gratia shall also be admissible to them.
(xiv)PointPaymentoffamily pension beyond the period mentioned in the PPO/CorrigendumPPO.
ClarificationIn some cases, it has been observed that the family pensioners have been sanctioned family pension for the limited period i.e. upto 25 years of age, till earning livelihood, till marriage/re-marriage, till widowhood etc. But, the family pension is being paid beyond the period mentioned in the PPO/Corrigendum PPO. Hence, family pension is required to be restricted up to the period/conditions mentioned in the PPO/Corrigendum PPO.
(xv)PointPaymentofdisability/warinjuryelementofpensionbeyondtheperiodmentionedin the PPO/Corrigendum PPO.
ClarificationIn some cases, it has been observed that disability/war injury element of pension have been sanctioned to the pensioners for the limited period. But, disability/war injury element of pension is being paid beyond the period mentioned in the PPO/Corrigendum PPO. Hence, disability/war injury element of pension is required to be restricted up to the period mentioned in the PPO/Corrigendum PPO.
(xvi)PointBenefitof delinking of 33 years of qualifying service for revision of pension of Pre-2006 pensioners/family pensioners
ClarificationComplaints from pensioners as well as other agencies are being received in this office that benefit of delinking of 33 years of qualifying service for revision of pension of Pre-2006 pensioners has not been given to pensioners/family pensioners. Necessary instructions in the matter have already been issued vide this office Circular No. 568 dated 13/10/2016 in respect of the Armed Forces pensioners/family pensioners and Circular No. C-149 dated 08/04/2016 in respect of Defence civilian pensioners/family pensioners. As circulars in the matter have been issued more than two year ago, it is requested to the PDAs to review the left over cases and settle urgently.
(xvii) PointNon-revisionof pension as per One Rank One Pension.
ClarificationIt has also been observed that in some of the cases, the pension of the Armed Forces pensioners has not been revised as per One Rank One Pension (OROP) effective from 01/07/2014 referring this office Circular No. 555 dated 04/02/2016. Hence, such pensioners/family pensioners are also being paid less pension than the entitlement as per 7th CPC. As circulars in the matter have been issued more than two year ago, it is requested from the PDAs to review left over cases and settle urgently.
(xviii) PointPaymentof pension/family pension without PPO(s)
ClarificationIn some cases, it has been observed that pensioners/family pensioners are being paid pension without the copy of PPO(s) issued in that case. For payment of pension, it is necessary that the PDA may have all the PPO(s) of the concern pensioners/family pensioners in the pension file of the pensioner maintained by the PDA. If the PDA is not having all the PPO(s) in any case, the missing PPO(s) may be obtained from the concerned Pension Sanctioning Authority (PSA) by sending loss certificate in the prescribed format and other necessary documents for issuance of duplicate copy of PPO(s).
(xviii) PointRevisionof Pension of DSC pensioners as per One Rank OnePension(CircularNo. 555 dated 04/02/2016)
Clarification
Pension of DSC personnel who are in the receipt of pension for DSC service only (i.e. those who served only in DSC or those who are getting single pension for the services rendered both in the Army and the DSC by way of counting former service in the Army along with the service in the DSC) shall be revised based on the same rates as provided for regular army under Table No. 7 of Circular No. 555 dated 04/02/2016. DSC personnel on ‘clerical duty’ and ‘other duty’ are entitled for pension of regular army personnel of group ‘Y’. However, for JCOs/ORs of DSC in receipt of 2nd pension due to their services in the DSC, their pension is required to be revised as per Table No. 8 of ibid circular. DSC personnel on ‘clerical duty’ and ‘other duty’ are entitled for the same rate of pension.
(xix)PointRevisionof Pension of Territorial Army as per One Rank One Pension(CircularNo. 555 dated 04/02/2016)
ClarificationIt has been observed that in some of the cases, the pension of the Territorial Army pensioners have been revised for other category of pensioners. For example: Service pension of JCO/ORs of Territorial Army has been revised as per Table No. 7 of Circular No. 555 dated 04/02/2016 instead of Table No. 9 of ibid circular.
(xx)PointIs the payment of pension in cash or through a joint account with or without "EITHER or SURVIVOR" facility permitted in the Schemefor Payment of Defence Pension by Public SectorBanks?
Clarification
Payment of pension in cash is not permitted in the scheme. However, the pension payment is permitted to be credited to a joint account operated by the pensioner with his/her spouse (either by ‘Former or Survivor’ or ‘Either or Survivor’ basis) in whose favour an authorization exists in the Pension Payment Order (PPO), subject to the following conditions:
(a) Once pension has been credited to a pensioner's bank account, the liability of the Government/Bank ceases. No further liability arises, even if the spouse wrongly draws from the account.
(b) As pension is payable only during the life of a pensioner, his/her death shall be intimated to the bank at the earliest and in any case within one month of the demise, so that the bank does not continue crediting monthly pension to the joint account with the spouse, after the death of the pensioner. If however, any amount has been wrongly credited to the joint account, it shall be recoverable from the joint account and/or any other account held by the pensioners/spouse either individually or jointly. The legal heirs, successors, executors etc. shall also be liable to refund any amount, which has been wrongly credited to the joint account.
(c) Pensioners who are drawing or desiring to get their pension from the Bank are required to submit an undertaking for recovery of over payment of pension/family pension to the branch bank, from where they are drawing pension in the prescribed form i.e. Annexure-K of “Scheme for payment of Defence Pensions by Public Sector Banks”. This would also be signed by the pensioner's spouse.
(xxi)PointIs Ordinary Family pension available to a widow/widower after remarriage?
Clarification
Earlier ordinary family pension to widow/widower was discontinued on re-marriage. However, scheme of Ordinary Family Pension has now been modified. Now, childless widow is entitled to Ordinary Family Pension even after her re-marriage w.e.f. 01/01/2006. The childless widow of a deceased employee who expired before 01/01/2006 shall also be eligible for family pension irrespective of the fact that the re-marriage of the widow had taken place prior to/on or after 01/01/2006 subject to fulfillment of prescribed conditions mentioned below:
(i) The childless widow of a deceased pensioner shall continue to be paid family pension even after her re-marriage subject to the condition that the family pension shall cease once her independent income from all other sources becomes equal to or higher than the minimum prescribed family pension in the Central Government. The family pensioner in such cases would be required to give a declaration regarding her income from all other sources to the Pension Disbursing Authority every six months.
(ii) Where the Ordinary Family Pension has been sanctioned till widowhood in the PPO, the family pension will not be automatically continued on re-marriage to childless widow. In such situation, corrigendum PPO for continuance of family pension to childless widow who re-marriage is required to be issued by the concern Pension Sanctioning Authority.
(iii) Family pension is not available to a childless widower after his remarriage.
(xxii) PointIs the Dearness Relief payable on original basic pension or on reducedpensionaftercommutation?
Clarification In some of the cases, it has been observed that dearness relief is being paid on reduced pension after deduction of commuted portion of pension. In this regard, it is intimated that Dearness Relief is payable on original basic pension before commutation.
(xxii) PointWrong debit
ClarificationIn some of the cases, it has been observed that although the pensioner is not defence pensioners, but pension disbursed to him is wrongly debited from defence head treating pensioners as defence pensioners. Hence, it is advised to the PDAs that such type of pensioners whose PPO(s) have not been issued by Pr. CDA (Pensions) Allahabad, JCDA (Air Force) New Delhi and Pr. CDA (Navy) Mumbai, their pension may not be debited from defence head. Their pension may be booked under concerned head of account and pension already disbursed to such pensioners and debited to defence head may be credited to defence head by sending demand draft of wrongly debited amount or through credit scrolls.

This Circular has been uploaded on this office website www.pcdapension.nic.in for dissemination to all concerned.
(SUSHIL KUMAR SINGH)
Addl. CDA (Pensions)

Source: Click here to view/download the PDF
[http://pcdapension.nic.in/pcdapension/6cpc/Circular-208.pdf]

Vacation and Breaks in Kendriya Vidyalayas during Academic Session 2019-20

$
0
0
Vacation and Breaks in Kendriya Vidyalayas during Academic Session 2019-20

KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN
(Min of HRD, Deptt. Of Education, Govt of India)
18-Institutional Area
Shaheed Jeet Singh Marg
New Delhi- 110016
एफ.110334/1/2019-20/के०वि०सं०मुख्‍या०/शैक्षिक/1539-73
दिनांक 28.12.2018
कार्यालय ज्ञापन 


The Competent Authority has decided the following schedule for Vacation and Breaks in Kendriya Vidyalayas for the Academic Session 2019-20.

()गर्मी वाले स्थान:-

(1) क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय:आगरा, भोपाल, चंडीगढ़, कोलकाता, देहरादून, दिल्ली, गुरूग्राम, गुवाहाटी, जयपुर, जम्मू, लखनऊ, पटना, रांची, सिलचर, तिनसुकिया व वाराणसी।
[post_ads]
1.Summer Vacation10.05.2019 (Friday)18.06.2019 (Tuesday)40 days
2.Autumn break06.10.2019 (Sunday)15.10.2019 (Tuesday)10 days
3.Winter break22.12.2019 (Sunday)10.01.2020 (Friday)20 days

(2) क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय: अहमदाबाद, बंगलुरु, (*) चेन्नई, हैदराबाद, जबलपुर, मुंबई, रायपुर।


1Summer Vacation02.05.2019 (Thursday)20.06.2019 (Thursday)50 days
2Autumn break06.10.2019 (Sunday)15.10.2019 (Tuesday)10 days
3Winter break23.12.2019 (Monday)01.01.2020 (Wednesday)10 days

(3) क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय: भूवनेश्वर और एर्णाकुलम।


1Summer Vacation11.04.2019 (Thursday)30.05.2019 (Thursday)50 days
2Autumn break06.10.2019 (Sunday)15.10.2019 (Tuesday)10 days
3Winter break23.12.2019 (Monday)01.01.2020 (Wednesday)10 days

[post_ads_2]
() सर्दी वाले स्थान


1Summer Vacation16.05.2019 (Thursday)25.05.2019 (Saturday)10 days
2Autumn break06.10.2019 (Sunday)15.10.2019 (Tuesday)10 days
3Winter break05.12.2019 (Thursday)23.01.2020 (Thursday)50 days

() अधिक सर्दी वाले स्थान

(1) लेह कारगिल  व नुब्रा (जम्‍‍‍मू एवं काश्‍‍‍‍मीर ) स्‍थ‍ित केंद्रीय विद्यालय

1Winter Vacation03.12.2019 (Tuesday)10.02.2020 (Monday)70 days

(2) केंद्रीय विद्यालय तवांग

1Summer Vacation10.05.2019 (Friday)29.05.2019 (Wednesday)20 days
2Winter break03.12.2019 (Tuesday)21.01.2020 (Tuesday)50 days

(3) केंद्रीय विद्यालय काठमांडू नेपाल

1Summer Vacation15.05.2019 (Wednesday)29.05.2019 (Wednesday)15 days
2Autumn break06.10.2019 (Sunday)15.10.2019 (Tuesday)10 days
3Winter break07.12.2019 (Saturday)20.01.2020 (Monday)45 days

Note:
1.  Both dates (days) are inclusive.
2. If the day of opening Vidyalaya is a holiday or declared a holiday by Govt., the Vidyalaya will open on the next working day.
(*) C-Kendriya Vidyalaya, Mahe (Chennai Region) will follow vacation & break schedule of Ernakulam Region.


(P.K. Kaul)
Deputy Commissioner (Acad)

kendriya-vidyalaya-vacation-and-breaks-2019-2020


Source: Click here to view/download the PDF
[https://kvsangathan.nic.in/sites/default/files/hq/ANN%281%29-03-01-2019_0.PDF]

NJCA meeting on 08th Feb 2019 on Non-settlement of issue viz Minimum Wage, Fitment Formula, NPS, Pay anomalies etc

$
0
0
NJCA meeting on 08th Feb 2019 on Non-settlement of issue viz Minimum Wage, Fitment Formula, NPS, Pay anomalies etc.

NJCA
National Joint Council of Action
4, State Entry Road New Delhi – 110055

No. NJCA/2018
Dated: January 28, 2019

All Members of the NJCA

Dear Comrades,

Sub: Meeting of the NJCA

Ref.: This office letter of even number dated 30.11.2018
[post_ads]
it nas been decided to hold meeting of the National Joint Council of Action{NJCA) on 8th February 2019, from 14:00 hrs. in JCM Office, 13-C, Ferozshah Road, New Delhi to take stock of the current situation in regard to non-settlement of major pending issues viz. (i) improvement in Minimum Wage and Fitment Formula, (ii) No progress in respect of NPS Covered Central Government Employees, (iii) Other pending issues. related to National and Departmental Anomalies.

All of you are requested to make it convenient to attend the aforementioned meeting of the NJCA, so as to take the consensus decision for future course of action in the prevalent scenario

With Fraternal Greetings.
[post_ads_2]
Comradely yours,

(Shiva Gopal Mishra)
Convener
njca-meeting-on-08th-feb-2019

Source: Confederation

KVS Order: Compensatory Leave to the teaching staff of the Vidyalayas for attending Vidyalayas

$
0
0
KVS Order: Compensatory Leave to the teaching staff of the Vidyalayas for attending Vidyalayas

KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN
18, INSTITUTIONAL AREA, 
SHAHEED JEET SINGH MARG,
NEW DELHI-110016

फा.स.11029/1/2018/KVS(Hqrs)/Acad/1802-2012 
द‍िनांक 08/01/2019

OFFICE ORDER

In supersession of the Office Order F.No.11029/59/2013-KVS (HQ/JC(Acady)50-1230 dated 13/15 January, 2014, the Compensatory Leave to the teaching staff of the Vidyalayas for attending Vidyalayas on Second Saturday, Sunday & Holidays and during breaks if the period is less than 10 days, may be regulated as follows:
[post_ads]
(i) Half day’s compensatory leave may be granted for taking extra classes for a minimum of two and upto four hours in a day and full day’s compensatory leave may be granted for taking extra classes for more than four hours in a day.

(ii) Whenever teachers are required for escort duties and training etc. on second Saturdays, Sundays, Holidays, vacation and breaks, normally they required to stay for a full day and they may be granted Compensatory Leave irrespective of the fact that whether they draw TA/DA or not.

(ii) Normally, Compensatory Leave may be granted to the teaching staff within one month of it’s becoming due. However, in exceptional circumstances, where grant of Compensatory leave to all the staff within a month may cause serious dislocation of work, the Compensatory leave may be permitted to be availed subsequently. Further, there will be no limit upto which the Compensatory Leave may be allowed to be availed of at a time. It may be noted that no Leave Encashment is payable for unavailed compensatory leave at the time of superannuation, resignation or death.
[post_ads_2]
Sd/-
(S. Vijayakumar)
Joint Commissioner (Acad)

[https://kvsangathan.nic.in/sites/default/files/hq/ANN%281%29-22-01-2019.PDF]

केंद्र सरकार ने 1 जनवरी, 2019 से रिसर्च फेलोशिप बढ़ाने की घोषणा की

$
0
0
केंद्र सरकार ने 1 जनवरी, 2019 से रिसर्च फेलोशिप बढ़ाने की घोषणा की


पत्र सूचना कार्यालय
भारत सरकार
विज्ञान और प्रौद्योगिकी मंत्रालय

30-जनवरी-2019 19:08 IST

केन्‍द्र सरकार ने रिसर्च फेलोशिप बढ़ाने की घोषणा की

केंद्र सरकार ने 1 जनवरी, 2019 से भौतिक और रासायनिक विज्ञान सहित विज्ञान और प्रौद्योगिकी, इंजीनियरिंग, गणितीय विज्ञान, कृषि विज्ञान, जीव विज्ञान, फार्मेसी आदि किसी भी क्षेत्र में दाखिला लेने वाले पीएचडी छात्रों और अन्य अनुसंधान कर्मियों की फेलोशिप बढ़ाई है। विज्ञान और प्रौद्योगिकी में काम कर रहे पीएचडी विद्वान औद्योगिक प्रतिस्पर्धा, शैक्षणिक जीवंतता और प्रौद्योगिकी नेतृत्व वाले नवाचारों के लिए देश के ज्ञान के आधार में महत्वपूर्ण योगदान करते हैं। फेलोशिप में की गई इस बढ़ोतरी से 60,000 से भी अधिक रिसर्च फेलो को प्रत्‍यक्ष रूप से लाभ होगा। जूनियर रिसर्च फेलोशिप पीएचडी कार्यक्रम में पहले दो वर्षों के लिए वर्तमान दर 25,000 रुपये से बढ़ाकर 31,000 रुपये प्रति माह कर दी गई है। इसी प्रकार पीएचडी सीनियर रिसर्च फेलो 28,000 रुपये की जगह 35,000 रुपये प्रति माह प्राप्‍त करेंगे। वरिष्‍ठ अनुसंधान एसोसिएट्स के लिए 54,000 रुपये प्रति माह निर्धारित किए गए हैं। सभी रिसर्च फेलो को केन्‍द्र सरकार के मानदंडों के अनुसार मकान किराया भत्‍ता भी मिलेगा।
[post_ads]
सरकार ने यह सुनिश्चित किया है कि यह सशक्तिकरण तंत्र समान रूप से फेलोशिप देने वाले देश के सभी मंत्रालयों, विभागों, एजेंसियों, शैक्षणिक एवं सरकारी अनुसंधान विकास संगठनों पर समान रूप से लागू होगा। सरकार ने पहली बार मजबूत वित्‍तीय और शैक्षिक प्रोत्‍साहन की सिफारिश की है, ताकि हमारे रिसर्च फेलो के कार्य प्रदर्शन में बढ़ोतरी हो और उसे मान्‍यता मिले।
***

Source: PIB News

7th CPC Casualty Penisonary Awards for Defence Forces Pensioners/family pensioner: DESW Order for Minimum Pension @ Rs.18000/- w.e.f. 01.01.2016

$
0
0
7th CPC Casualty Penisonary Awards for Defence Forces Pensioners/family pensioner: DESW Order for Minimum Pension @ Rs.18000/- w.e.f. 01.01.2016

No.16(3)/2017/D(Pen/Policy)
Government of India/ भारत सरकार
Ministry of Defence/ रक्षा मंत्रालय
Department of Ex-Servicemen Welfare
New Delhi-110011, Dated, 29th January, 2019

To

The Chief of the Army Staff
The Chief of the Naval Staff
The Chief of the Air Staff

Subject- Implementation of Government decision on the recommendations of the Seventh Central Pay Commission- Provisions regulating Casualty Pensionary Awards for Defence Forces pensioners/family pensioners- regarding.

Sir,

I am directed to refer to the provisions for revision of various kinds of pensionary awards notified in implementation of the Government decision on recommendations of Seventh CPC vide this Ministry's letters No 17(01)/2016-D(Pen/Pol) dated 29 Oct, 2016 amended vide this Ministry's letter No 17(01)/2017/(01) /D(Pension/Policy) dated 4th Sept, 2017 read with letter No 17(01)/2017/(02)/D(Pension/Policy) dated 5th Sept, 2017 for pre-1.1.2016 Armed Forces pensioners/family pensioners and vide letter No 17(02)/2016-D(Pen/Pol) dated 4th Sept, 2017 for post-1.1.2016 Armed Forces pensioners/family pensioners.
[post_ads]
2. In partial modification of above said orders, it has now been decided that following minimum ceiling shall be applied to the under-mentioned casualty pensionary awards:

2.1 The Disability/Liberalized Disability/ War Injury pension (i.e. total of service element plus disability/ liberalized disability / war injury element as the case may be), shall be subject to minimum of Rs 18,000/- per month irrespective of degree of disability of the personnel.

2.2 In cases of disability pension where permanent disability is not less than 60%, the disability pension (i.e. total of service element plus disability element) shall not be less than 60% of the reckonable emoluments as defined in above mentioned orders, subject to a minimum of Rs 18,000/- per month.

2.3. The amount of special family pension, admissible to the families of Armed Forces personnel, shall be subject to a minimum of Rs 18,000/- per month.

2.4 The amount of liberalized family pension, admissible to the child/ children of Armed Forces personnel, shall be subject to a minimum of Rs 18,000/- per month.

3. All other provisions stipulated in above mentioned Government orders which are not affected by the provisions of this letter, shall remain unchanged.

4. The provisions of this letter shall take effect from 1.1.2016.
[post_ads_2]
5. This issues with the concurrence of Finance Division of this Ministry vide their ID No. 10(16)2018/Fin/Pen dated 26.12.2018.

6. Hindi version will follow.

Yours faithfully

(Manoj Sinha)
Deputy Secretary to the Government of India

Copy to:

MoD(Fin/Pension)
CGDA, New Delhi.
As per standard distribution list.

7th CPC Revision of allowances of teachers, equivalent academic staff, Registrars, Finance Officers and Controller of Examination in Universities and colleges: MoHRD Order

$
0
0
7th CPC Revision of allowances of teachers, equivalent academic staff, Registrars, Finance Officers and Controller of Examination in Universities and colleges: MoHRD Order

No.1-4/2017-U.II
Government of India
Ministry of Human Resource Development
Department of Higher Education

New Delhi, dated the 28th January, 2019

To,

The Secretary,
University Grants Commission,
Bahadurshah Zafar Marg,
New Delhi — 110 002.

Subject: Revision of allowances of teachers, equivalent academic staff, Registrars, Finance Officers and Controller of Examination in Universities and colleges as per recommendations of 7th CPC-regd.

Sir,

In continuation of this Ministry's letter No.1-7/2015-U.II(1) dated 02.11.2017 and letter No.1-7/2015-U.II(2) dated 02.11.2017, it is informed that that the Government of India have decided, in consultation with the Ministry of Finance (Department of Expenditure), to revise the rate of allowances of teachers, equivalent academic staff, Registrars, Finance Officers and Controller of Examinations in Central Universities and colleges there under and Centrally funded Deemed to be Universities on the basis of recommendations of the 7th Central Pay Commission, with immediate effect.

2. It has been decided that the rates of the allowances admissible during the 6th CPC shall be revised in accordance with the provisions of the Department of Expenditure’s OM No.1/1/2016-E-lII(A) dated 26th July, 2017, read with Department of Expenditure’s Resolution dated 06.07.2017 and the Government orders issued in the matter, for teachers, equivalent academic staff, Registrars, Finance Officers and Controller of Examinations in Central Universities and colleges thereunder and Centrally funded Deemed to be Universities.

3. It is also informed that the rate of Special Allowances for the post of Vice-Chancellor, Pro Vice-Chancellor and College Principals has been revised by a factor of 2.25 and the revised Special Allowances are as follows:

S.No.PostRevised Special Allowance per month
1Vice-ChancellorRs.11,250/-
2Pro Vice-ChancellorRs.9,000/-
3Principals in PG college Rs.6,750/-
4Principals in UG collegeRs.4,500/-

4. This issues with the concurrence of Internal Finance Division vide Dy. No.267/IFD dated 28th January, 2019.

Yours faithfully,

Sd/-
(Dr. Renuka Mishra)
Director

7th-cpc-revision-of-allowances-mohrd-order-28-01-2019

[http://mhrd.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/Revision%20of%20allowances%20order.pdf]

Request for Grant of Qualification Pay to the Nursing Personnel in 7th CPC Pay Structure

$
0
0
Request for Grant of Qualification Pay to the Nursing Personnel in 7th CPC Pay Structure

A.I.R.F.
All India Railwaymen's Federation
4, STATE ENTRY ROAD, NEW DELHI-110055

No.AIRF/101 
 Dated: January 28, 2019


The Member Staff,
Railway Board,
New Delhi

Dear Sir,
Sub: Grant of Qualification Pay to the Nursing Personnel
Ref.: MoH&FW’s F.No.Z.28015/53/2017-N dated 28.09.2018

[post_ads]
The Nursing Staff who have been in possession of BSc. Degree were being paid “Qualification Pay” (two additional increments) even after implementation of recommendations of the VII CPC. However, after implementation of VII CPC recommendations, no revision of additional increment, as mentioned-above, being paid to the Nursing Staff, as has been done so far. This is causing heart burning to the said category of staff.

It is understood that, the issue is already being taken-up by the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare(Government of India) for the Nursing Staff working in other than Railway Hospitals.

It is, therefore, requested that, the matter may be looked into on priority for revision of additional increments in consonance with the recommendation of the VII CPC in case of Nursing Staff, working in Railway Hospitals, as “Qualification Pay”.

An early action in the matter shall be highly appreciated.

Yours faithfully,

(Shiva Gopal Mishra)
General Secretary

Source: http://www.airfindia.org/2019/01/28/grant-of-qualification-pay-to-the-nursing-personnel/

7th CPC - Benchmarking for MACPS - Employees who were eligible prior to 25.07.2016 with "Good" APAR, should be given this benefit: AIRF's request

$
0
0
7th CPC - Benchmarking for MACPS - Employees who were eligible prior to 25.07.2016 with "Good" APAR, should be given this benefit: AIRF's request

Benchmarking for the purpose of granting financial upgradation under MACPS – Recommendations of the VII CPC – Reg

A.I.R.F.
All India Railwaymen's Federation
4, STATE ENTRY ROAD, NEW DELHI-110055
No.AIRF/MACPS 
Dated: January 28, 2019

The Chairman,
Railway Board,
New Delhi
[post_ads]
Dear Sir,

Sub: Benchmarking for the purpose of granting financial upgradation under MACPS – Recommendations of the VII CPC – Reg.

Your kind attention is invited towards AIRF’s correspondence on the above-mentioned subject matter, vide letter No.AIRF/MACPS dated 30th January, 2017, followed by reminders dated 17th March, 2017, 17th May, 2017 and 22nd May, 2017. AIRF, explaining the scenario in the Indian Railways, in regard to APARs of the Railway Employees’. AIRF has repeatedly requested the Railway Board to review the benchmarking from Very Good to “Good”, so that, maximum number of Railwaymen are not deprived of financial benefits under the said scheme. Railway Board vide their letter No.PC-V/2016/MACPS/1 dated 19.05.2017 had declined to accede to the demand of the Federation(AIRF), stating that, as DoP&T is the Nodal Department of the Government for the purpose of MACPS, Railway Board cannot deviate from the instructions issued by them. AIRF had further demanded, at several occasions, that, at least in case of those employees who were eligible for financial upgradation under MACPS prior to 25.07.2016(the date of implementation of revised benchmarking) should be given this benefit, even though they are having “Good” benchmark in their APARs, i.e., to say that, their cases should be dealt with on the criteria of benchmark for MACPS that was in vogue prior to 25.07.2016. In this connection, attention is also drawn towards Office Memorandum No.1/Org./MACP/2018(186)/117 dated 10th January, 2019 of Sashastra Seema Bal; a copy of which is being enclosed for ready reference. It may be noted from the aforementioned Office Memorandum dated 10.01.2019 of the SSB, that, they have taken a decision in the matter at their own level and have clarified that, for grant of financial upgradation under MACPS, the prescribed benchmark would be Very Good w.e.f. 25.07.2016 onwards and APAR grading “Good” for the period prior to 25.07.2016 be treated as “Very Good” while considering such cases by the Screening Committee for granting benefit of financial upgradation under MACPS.

It would, therefore, be quite appropriate that, Railway Board should also issue similar clarification to all the Railway Administrations, so that, the cases in which employees were eligible for financial upgradation under MACPS prior to 25.07.2016, the benchmark “Good” be treated as “Very Good”, and revised benchmark should only be insisted upon in case of 25.07.2016 onward.

An early action in the matter shall be highly appreciated.

[post_ads_2]
Yours faithfully,

(Shiva Gopal Mishra)
General Secretary

Copy to: General Secretaries, all affiliated unions – for information.

Source: AIRF - http://www.airfindia.org/2019/01/28/benchmarking-for-the-purpose-of-granting-financial-upgradation-under-macps-recommendations-of-the-vii-cpc-reg/

Request to grant of GP Rs.4200(Level-6) to Dressers/OT Asstt. working in the Railway Hospitals/Health Units

$
0
0
Request to grant of GP Rs.4200(Level-6) to Dressers/OT Asstt. working in the Railway Hospitals/Health Units

A.I.R.F.
All India Railwaymen's Federation
4, STATE ENTRY ROAD, NEW DELHI-110055
No.AIRF/PNM/60/2018 
Dated: January 28, 2019

The Secretary(E),
Railway Board,
New Delhi

Dear Sir,

Sub: Provision of GP Rs.4200(Level-6) to Dressers/OT Asstt. working in the Railway Hospitals/Health Units
[post_ads]
Board’s Attention is invited towards AIRF’s PNM Item No.60/2018, wherein AIRF has demanded initial Grade Pay of Rs.2000 in the case of Dressers working in the Railway Hospitals/Health Units.

In this connection, Board’s attention is also invited towards Ministry of Health & Family Welfare’s letter No.V-17020/189/2018-INI-II dated 07.09.2018, wherein following pay structure for the category of Dressers/OT Asstt. has been approved and circulated to all concerned:-

(i) OT Technician – Entry Level GP Rs.4200(Level-6 of VII CPC)

(ii) Sr. Technician(on promotion from GP Rs.4200) to be placed in GP Rs.4600(Level-7 of VII CPC)

(iii) Sr. Technician(OT) is eligible for promotion as Technical Officer(OT) in GP Rs.5400(Level-9 of VII CPC)

(iv) Technical Officer(OT) in GP Rs.5400(Level-9 of VII CPC) is eligible for promotion to Sr. Technical Officer(OT) in GP Rs.6600(Level-11 of VII CPC)

AIRF, therefore, desires that, Dressers/OT Asstt., working in the Railway Hospitals/Health Units, be provided with similar pay structure, as already approved and circulated by the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, the Nodal Ministry, with effect from the date mentioned in their letter ibid dated 07.09.2018.
[post_ads_2]
Yours faithfully,

(Shiva Gopal Mishra)
General Secretary

Source: http://www.airfindia.org/2019/01/28/provision-of-gp-rs-4200level-6-to-dressersot-asstt-working-in-the-railway-hospitalshealth-units/

MACPS: Appeal to treat APAR grading of ‘Good’ instead of ‘Very Good’ as eligible for MACPS for Group C as for the promotions for Group C

$
0
0
MACPS: Appeal to treat APAR grading of ‘Good’ instead of ‘Very Good’ as eligible for MACPS for Group C as for the promotions for Group C

INDIAN RAILWAYS TECHNICAL SUPERVISORS ASSOCIATION

No. IRTSA/Memo RB / 2019-1
Date: 29-1-2019

Member Staff,Railway Board.
Rail Bhawan, New Delhi-110001

Sir,

Subject: Grant of Financial upgradation under MACPS – Appeal to treat APAR grading of ‘Good’ instead of ‘Very Good’ as eligible for MACPS for Group C as for the promotions for Group C.

Reference: Railway Board’s letter No. PC-V/20 6/MACPS/1 (RBE No. 155/2016) dated 19.12.2016
[post_ads]
We have to submit for your kind consideration that the criteria for eligibility for Financial Upgrading under MACPS, which was same as that for Promotions, has been changed for Group ‘C’ Staff, from APARs being “Good” earlier to that of APARs to be “Very Good” (as applicable for Group “A” Officers) vide orders cited above. This had a very adverse impact on a very large number of Group ‘C’ employees (who were already stagnating for many years due to lack of avenues of promotion).

2. The new criteria had made many Group ‘C’ employees graded as ‘Good’ to be ineligible for any financial upgradation under MACPS. Retrospective effect of this order was a further damper on the aspirations for some rise & motivation of employees starving for promotion. It was totally unjustified to have different criteria for Promotion and for MACPS. It also defeated the very purpose of MACPS for providing relief to those who could not get the regular promotions due to limited avenues of promotion on account of pyramidal cadre structure.

3. Railway Board vide its letter No. E(NG)I-2018/CR/2 (RBE No.29/2018) dated 27.02.2018 provided opportunity to the employees who had been awarded “Good” or below Grading in their previous years APARs, as a onetime measure, to represent for enhancing their grading for the purpose of MACPS. This order of Railway Board had given relief to some of the employees, but still many employees are left out from getting any relief mainly because the Appellate authorities found it to be impertinent& below dignity of their ilk to change grading awarded by the concerned officers.

4. It is, therefore, requested that necessary orders may please be issued for treating APAR Grading of ‘Good’ as eligible for MACPS for Group ‘C Staff so as to be the same as for their promotion.
[post_ads_2]
Thanking you,

Yours’ faithfully,

Harchandan Singh,
General Secretary, IRTSA

Copy for information & necessary action to:
Secretary Establishment, Railway Board, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi - 110001

Source: http://www.irtsa.net/pdfdocs/Memo-regarding-Grant-of-Financial-upgradation-under-MACPS-Appeal-to-treat-APAR-grading-of-Good-instead-of-Very-Good-as-eligible-for-MACPS-for-Group-C-as-for-the-promotions-for-Group-C.pdf

31st Meeting of SCOVA - 1. Health Care facilities for Railway Pensioners 2. Application of Courts judgements for similarly placed Pre-2006 Pensioners – Fresh Agenda items by RSCWS

$
0
0
31st Meeting of SCOVA - 1. Health Care facilities for Railway Pensioners 2. Application of Courts judgements for similarly placed Pre-2006 Pensioners – Fresh Agenda items by RSCWS 

RAILWAY SENIOR CITIZENS WELFARE SOCIETY
H.O 32, Phase- 6, Mohali, Chandigarh -160055 
(AFFILIATED TO BHARAT PENSIONERS’ SAMAJ (BPS))
IDENTIFIED BY DOP&PW GOVT. OF INDIA - UNDER PENSIONERS’ PORTAL
MEMBER, SCOVA (STANDING COMMITTEE FOR VOLUNTARY AGENCIES) (GOI)

No. RSCWS/HO/CHD/SCOVA/2019-1 
Dated: 30-1-2019

Shri Charanjit Taneja,
Under Secretary to the Government of India,
Department of Pension & Pensioners’ Welfare,
3rd Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan,
Khan Market, New Delhi – 110003
CC: By Email to : c.taneja@nic.in

Dear Sir,

Subject: 31st Meeting of Standing Committee of Voluntary Agencies (SCOVA) under the chairmanship of Hon’ble MOS (PP) – Suggestions for fresh Agenda items.

Reference: DOP&PW letter F. No. 42/03/2019 – P&PW(D) 18-1-2019

In reference to your letter cited above, following items are proposed and sent herewith for consideration for inclusion in the Agenda of 31st Meeting of Standing Committee of Voluntary Agencies (SCOVA) under the chairmanship of Hon’ble MOS (PP).
[post_ads]
Item 1. Improvement of Health Care facilities required for Railway Pensioners/RELHS Beneficiaries

Item 2. Computation of Revised Minimum Pension for implementation of 6th Pay Commission Report at 50% of Pay in PB + GP with respect to the scale of pay of the post in question and not to the corresponding scale of pay at which the incumbent retired – Request for Application of judgements of various Courts for Revision of Pension of similarly placed Pre-2006 Pensioners

I, Harchandan Singh, Secretary General RSCWS (Railway Senior Citizens Welfare Society) shall be attending the said Meeting of SCOVA.

With best wishes & regards,

Yours truly,

(Harchandan Singh),
Secretary General, RSCWS.
(In Camp; At Mumbai
Up-to Mid-March, 2019)

Encls: Two items (As above)

Items proposed by RSCWS for Agenda of 31st Meeting of SCOVA

(Ref: DOPPW letter F. No. 42/03/2019 – P&PW(D) 18-1-2019)

Item 1. Improvement of Health Care facilities required for Railway Pensioners/RELHS Beneficiaries:

Railway Medical Beneficiaries, especially the old age RELHS Optees are at times put to inconvenience & hardship due to existing procedural problems especially in getting specialized medical treatment in Emergency and for getting referral for treatment in empanelled hospital. It is requested that the Railways may please simplify the system in regard to the following vital areas (none of which involves any financia implications but will reduce the hardship of the old age Pensioners):
[post_ads_2]
a) Authorisation of Doctors of Railway Health Units for referral to empanelled private hospitals: Railway Board vide its orders No.2018/Trans Cell/Health/Medical issues dated 24-1-2019 has decided that the Railway Beneficiaries may be referred for treatment & Investigation to private empanelled and other Government Hospitals by “two Doctors”. This has left out the Single Doctor Health Units in cities like Chandigarh as not being authorised to refer the cases to Empanelled specialized Hospitals and thus compelling the Railway Beneficiaries to travel long distances from such cities, towns & areas which have single Doctor Health Units to reach out to the two authorized Doctors to get a referral for an ailing patient. The hardship thus continues for majority of Old age patients to get the requisite treatment.

It is requested that the Doctors of the Railway Health Units be authorized to refer the Railway Beneficiaries/RELHS Optees to private empanelled hospitals and if so required, the Health Unit Doctor may get the approval from the other authorized Doctor on Phone and record it on the referral documents.

b) Waiving of condition of Referral from Railway Doctor of RELHS Optees for OPD Consultation & treatment in Government Hospitals: It is requested that RELHS Optees be not required to get a referral from Railway Doctor for treatment in Centre or State Government Hospitals of their choice & convenience – on Reimbursement basis.

c) Simplification of Procedure for RELHS Beneficiaries for Treatment at private empanelled hospitals without referral by the Railway Doctor, if they are advised specialized treatment by a Specialist in a Central Government/State Govt. Hospital - as has now been allowed to CGHS Beneficiaries vide Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, OM No.Z15025/105/2017/DIR/CGHS/EHS dated 9-11-2017 – Reg. Simplification of procedure for treatment at private hospitals empanelled under CGHS/CS (MA) Rules, 1944.

d) Reasonable Period of Validity of Referral & for approval by Railway Doctors for treatment in Emergency in Empanelled Private Hospitals for Railway/RELHS Beneficieries - as has now been allowed to CGHS Beneficiaries vide Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, GOI, OM No.  Z15025/117/2017/DIR/CGHS/EHS dated-15-1-2018 regarding Revision of Guidelines regarding Simplification of referral System under CGHS.

Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, vide their orders dated 10-12-2018 cited above have prescribed a period for validity of Referral to empanelled private hospitals as 30 days for treatment/investigation and Consultation and 3 months for multiple Consultation with 3 specialists for listed treatment procedures on advice by CGHS Specialist.

It is requested that the guidelines for CGHS issued by MOH&FW vide their letter cited above may please be considered for their application to the Railway Medical beneficiaries; And similar guidelines may also please be issued regarding adequate validity of Approval for Treatment in Emergency in the Empanelled Private Hospitals for Railway Beneficiaries.

e) Special provisions for Treatment of RELHS Beneficiaries who are above 80 years of age especially regarding “Priority for Treatment in Hospitals”; “Settlement of Medical Reimbursement Bills” & “Referral to Private Hospital of choice” - as prescribed for CGHS Beneficiaries vide MOH&FW OM No.Z–16025/98/2017/CGHS-III dated 11-7-2017.

f) OPD Consultation in Empanelled Hospitals for Railway Medical/RELHS Beneficiaries – as per procedure prescribed for the CGHS Beneficiaries vide MOH&FW OM No.  Z15025/117/2017/DIR/CGHS/EHS Dated dated-15-1-2018 regarding Simplification of referral System under CGHS.

g) Issue of Medicines for 3 Months in case of Chronic Diseases to RELHS Optees as has been done for CGHS Beneficiaries vide MOH&FW OM No.F.No.2-2/2014-CGHS HQ/PPT/CGHS (P) dated 25-8-2014 & 21-10-2014.

h) i) Expeditious implementation of CTSE (Cashless Treatment System in Emergency) in empanelled hospitals to all RELHS Beneficiaries all over India and expeditious issue of SMART CARDS for the same. Incidentally, the same has yet not been completed in the four Metro cities where the same are held up since 2016. It may please be expedited.

ii) Detailed instructions for extension of CTSE for other Cities – as referred to in Railway Board’s letter No.2014/H/28/1/Smart Card/Part A, dated 02.11.2018 may be issued early and SMART CARDS for the same may also please be expedited

iii) Waiving of additional charges for CTSE from RELHS Beneficiaries as they had already made one-time payment for joining RELHS which fully covered Cashless Treatment in Emergency in local Empanelled hospitals where card was registered and against reimbursement in other cities in India. The only difference which the CTSE will make is the Cashless treatment instead of Reimbursable treatment in other cities. This is totally unjustified and may please be waived off.

(Continued for Item 2)

Items proposed by RSCWS for Agenda of 31st Meeting of SCOVA

Item 2. Computation of Revised Minimum Pension for implementation of 6th Pay Commission Report at 50% of Pay in PB + GP with respect to the scale of pay of the post in question and not to the corresponding scale of pay at which the incumbent retired – Request for Application of judgements of various Courts for Revision of Pension of similarly placed Pre-2006 Pensioners

i) High Court of Kerala in its final judgment dated 16-12-2016 in WPC No. 34171/2016, WPC No. 22153/2016 and WPC No. 21477/2016 held that that “Kerala High Court found that the computation of pension in the matter of implementation of the 6th pay commission report has to be at 50% of the pay scale with respect to the scale of pay applicable to the post in question and not to the corresponding scale of pay to the one at which the incumbent has retired.

ii) CAT Bangalore in OA.No.170/00730/2017 in its judgement dated 18-6-2018, had held that “11. The OM dtd.13.11.2009 had clearly stipulated that the posts which were in the pre-revised pay scale of Rs.6500-10500 as on 1.1.2006 and which were granted the normal replacement pay structure of grade pay of Rs.4200 will be granted grade pay of Rs.4600 corresponding to the pre-revised scale of Rs.7450-11500 with effect from 01.01.2006. This makes evidently clear that the applicants were to be considered against the pay scale of Rs.7450-11500 with grade pay of Rs.4600. The revised pay and pension has to be calculated on that basis and that comes to Rs.9230. The manner of computing the pension by the respondents is therefore completely wrong and bereft of any logic. --------------------. The respondents are directed to grant revised pension of Rs.9230/- to the applicant w.e.f. 01.01.2006 along with consequential benefits within a period of one(1) month from the date of receipt of copy of this order.”

iii) CAT Ernakulam in OA No. 180-00052-2017 decided on 12-9-2018 in K.G. Manoharan & others Vs UOI & others decided that applicants are entitled to a revised pension in terms of paragraph 4.2 of OM dated 1.9.2008 or 50% of the minimum pay in the pay band of Rs.9300-34800 with Grade Pay of Rs.4600 (in case of applicants 1 to 12) & Rs.4800 (in the case of applicants 13 & 14) or as per Annexure A4 fitment table, whichever is beneficial to the applicants.

iv) CAT Ernakulam dated 23.10.18 has held in OA No. 180-01071-2017 “The OM dated 13.11.2009 had clearly stipulated that the posts which were in the pre-revised pay scale of Rs.6500-10500 as on 1.1.2006 and which were granted the normal replacement pay structure of grade pay of Rs.4200 will be granted grade pay of Rs.4600 corresponding to the pre-revised scale of Rs.7450-11500 with effect from 01.01.2006. This makes evidently clear that the applicants were to be considered against the pay scale of Rs.7450-11500 with grade pay of Rs.4600. SLP against the judgement was dismissed

v) It is, therefore, requested that:

a) The policy decisions of the judgements of various Courts, may please be equitably applied to all the Petitioners as well as to all similarly placed Pensioners as required under Article 14, 16 of the Constitution.

b) Computation of minimum revised pension for the purpose of implementation of 6th pay commission report be done at 50% of the pay in the Pay Band plus Grade Pay with respect to the scale of pay corresponding to replacement pay scale as applicable to the post of varous Categories – (as enlisted in Schedule B of CCS (Revised Pay) Rules 2008) and as revised thereafter, and not to the scale of pay corresponding to the normal replacement scale at which the incumbent had retired.

Source: https://www.rscws.com/pdfdocs/Items-for-Agenda-of-31st-Meeting-of-SCOVA-proposed-by-RSCWS.pdf

7th CPC Breakdown Allowance - Denial of payment to the staff working in GP 2000/Level 3: NFIR

$
0
0
7th CPC Breakdown Allowance - Denial of payment to the staff working in GP 2000/Level 3: NFIR

Registration No. : RTU/Nnn/31/2012 
NFIR 
National Federation of Indian Railwaymen 
3, CHELMSFORD ROAD, NEW DELHI - 110055

Affiliated to :
Indian National Trade Union Congress (INTUC)
International Transport Workers' Federation (lTF)
No.1/5(g)/Pt.V
Dated: 28/01/2019
The Secretary (E),
Railway Board,
New Delhi

Dear Sir,
Sub: Denial of payment of Breakdown Allowance to the staff working in GP 2000/Level 3 of 7th CPC-reg.
Ref: (i) Railway Board’s letter No.E(P&A)II-2017/BDA-1 dated 30/08/2017 (RBE No.106/2017).
(ii) NFIR’s letter No.I/5(g)/Part V dated 11/04/2018.
(iii) Railway Board’s letter No.E(P&A)II-2017/BDA-1 dated 14/09/2018 (RBE No.138/2018).
(iv) NFIR’s letter No.1/5(g)/Pt.V dated 22/09/2018.

[post_ads]
Vide letter dated 22/09/2018 Federation had requested the Railway Board to issue modified instructions for payment of Breakdown Allowance to the staff with Grade Pay 2000 who have been denied the same on the basis of their higher Grade Pay.

In this connection, NFIR reiterates that the Break Down Allowance is granted to the Technical and other safety category staff as compensatory Allowance as they are expected to perform extraordinary duties, therefore they should be granted this Allowance based on the pay actually drawn by them without any condition/restriction.

While enclosing copy of letter dated 22/09/2018, NFIR once again requests the Railway Board to consider the points brought out by the Federation and issue instructions allowing enhanced rate of Break Down Allowance to those staff with GP 2000 (6th CPC)/Pay Level 3.

[post_ads_2]
A copy of the instructions issued may be endorsed to the Federation.

DA/As above

Yours faithfully,

(Dr. M. Raghavaiah).
General Secretary
7th-cpc-breakdown-allowance-denial-to-railway-staff-nfir-letter

Source: NFIR

7th CPC Revision of Pension of Pre-2016 Retired Running Staff- Improper instructions of Railway Board

$
0
0
7th CPC Revision of Pension of Pre-2016 Retired Running Staff- Improper instructions of Railway Board
NFIR 
National Federation of Indian Railwaymen 
3, CHELMSFORD ROAD, NEW DELHI - 110055
No.II/35/2018
Dated:28-01-2019
The Secretary(E)
Railway Board
New Delhi

Dear Sir,
Sub: Revision of Pension of Pre-2016 Retired Running Staff- Improper instructions of Railway Board – reg.
Ref: (i) GS/NFIR’s letter to Railway Board vide no.II/35/Part XIV dated 15-01-2018
(ii) Railway Board’s letter No.D-43/34/3017-F(E)III dated 24-01-2018
(iii) NFIR’s letter No.II/35/Part XIV dated 12-02-2018 & 26-02-2018 addressed to CRB.
(iv) NFIR’s PNM Agenda Item No.9 sent to Railway Board on 26-06-2018
(v) DoP&PW O.M.No.38/17/18-P&PW (A) dated 1st June 2018 to Railway Board.
(vi) Railway Board’s O.M.No.D-43/34/2017-F(E)III,dated 23-05-2018 & 16-08-2018 to Department of pension & Pensioners welfare Lok Nayak Bhawan, New delhi
(vii) NFIR’s letter No.II/35/2018 dated 19.09.2018 to Railway Boards.
[post_ads]
Federation vide its letter dated 15-01-2018 provided to the Railway Board sample concordance tables for revision of pension cases of pre-01-01-2016 retired Running Staff. Railway Board vide letter dated 24-01-2018 have however issued instructions for revision of pension of pre-2016 retired Running Staff. The Federation vide its letter dated 26-02-2018 had pointed they be withdrawn as the same do not ensure correct revising of pension fixation of pre-2016 retired Running Staff. Federation also cited various provisions of DoP&PW and also those contained in IREM. Consequently, Railway Board vide O.M.dated 23-05-2018 sought clarification from DoP&PW to which the DoP&PW vide O.M.dated 01st June 2018 wanted few illustrations of the formulation so as to compare the pay/pension as on 01-01-2016 as per Railway Board’s instructions dated 24-01-2018 with pay and payable pension as suggested by our Unions.

Federation has come to know that the detailed information sought for by the DoP&PW has since been conveyed by the Railway Ministry vide OM dated 16-08-2018, but however progress in the matter is yet to be apprised to the Federation.

In this connection, NFIR also invites kind attention of the Railway Board to PNM Agenda item No.9 (sent to Railway Board on 26-06-2018) discussions on which are yet to take place. Federation however gives below additional points for consideration:-
  • Pay of General Category staff in Grade 5500-9000 on 31-05-2015 with 3 stagnation increments (i.e 9525/- Rs.56900) as on 01-01-2016
  • Likewise the Notional Pay of Running Should be fixed as Rs.56900 + 30% i.e. Rs.73,970. Thus, retirement benefit of Running Staff would then be calculated on Notional pay i.e. Rs.73,970 + 55% – Rs.1,14,659 and payable pension comes to Rs.57329.50
  • whereas, as per Railway Board’s order 30% pay element is not to be added on Rs.56900 and retirement benefit calculated on Rs.56900 + 55% divided by 2 i.e. Rs.56900 + 31295 = 88195 divided by 2 i.e. Rs.44090 hence a loss of Rs.13,229 in pension.
[post_ads_2]
NFIR, therefore, once again requests the Railway Board to furnish proper illustrations to the DoP&PW for obtaining clear clarification for arriving at actual entitled pension to the retired Running Staff. A copy of the reference made to the DoP&Pw may also be provided to the Federation.

Yours faithfully

(Dr.M.Raghavaiah)
General Secretary

7thcpc-revision-of-pension-of-pre-2016-retired-running-staff-page1

7thcpc-revision-of-pension-of-pre-2016-retired-running-staff-page1

Source: NFIR

Expected DA - AICPIN for the month of December 2018 decreased by 1 point

$
0
0
Expected DA - AICPIN for the month of December 2018 decreased by 1 point

No. 5/1/2018-CPI
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT
LABOUR BUREAU

`CLEREMONT’, SHIMLA-171004
DATED: 31st January, 2019

Press Release

Consumer Price Index for Industrial Workers (CPI-IW) — December, 2018

The All-India CPI-IW for December, 2018 decreased by 1 point and pegged at 301 (three hundred and one). On 1-month percentage change, it decreased by (-) 0.33 per cent between November, 2018 and December, 2018 when compared with the decrease of (-) 0.69 per cent for the corresponding months of last year.
[post_ads]
The maximum downward pressure to the change in current index came from Food group contributing (-) 1.38 percentage points to the total change. At item level, Onion, Banana, Coconut, Lemon, Brinjal, Cabbage, Chillies Green, Carrot, Cauliflower, French Bean, Palak, Peas, Potato, Radish, Tomato, Sugar, Cooking Gas, Petrol, etc. are responsible for the decrease in index. However, this decrease was checked by Fish Fresh, Poultry (Chicken), Tea (Readymade), E.S.I. Contribution Premium, Repair Charges (Bicycle), etc., putting upward pressure on the index.

The year-on-year inflation measured by monthly CPI-IW stood at 5.24 per cent for December, 2018 as compared to 4.86 per cent for the previous month and 4.00 per cent during the corresponding month of the previous year. Similarly, the Food inflation stood at (-) 0.96 per cent against (-) 1.57 per cent of the previous month and 4.32 per cent during the corresponding month of the previous year.

At centre level Munger Jamalpur, Tripura and Doom-Dooma Tinsukia reported the maximum decrease of (6 points each) followed by Ranchi Hatia, Lucknow and Kanpur (5 points each). Among others, 4 points decrease was observed in 3 centres, 3 points in 7 centres, 2 points in 16 centres and 1 point in 13 centres. On the contrary, Salem recorded a maximum increase of 6 points followed by Jalpaiguri (5 points). Among others, 2 points increase was observed in 4 centres and 1 point in 12 centres. Rest of the 15 centres’ indices remained stationary.

The indices of 36 centres are above All-India Index and 41 centres’ indices are below national average. The index of Chandigarh centre remained at par with All-India Index.
[post_ads_2]
The next issue of CPI-IW for the month of January, 2019 will be released on Thursday, 28th February, 2019. The same will also be available on the office website www.labourbureaunew.gov.in.

(AMRIT LAL JANGID)
DEPUTY DIRECTOR

press-note-cpi-iw-dec-2018-eng

press-note-cpi-iw-dec-2018-hin

http://labourbureaunew.gov.in/Press_Note_CPI_IW_DEC_2018_EH.pdf

Budget 2019-20: No Tax upto Rs.5 Lakh, 1.5 Lakh for Saving, Standard Deduction Rs.50,000 & Bank Interest TDS threshhold Rs. 40,000

$
0
0
Budget 2019-20: No Tax upto Rs.5 Lakh, 1.5 Lakh for Saving, Standard Deduction Rs.50,000 & Bank Interest TDS threshhold Rs. 40,000 

Individual taxpayers having annual income upto Rs 5 lakhs will get full tax rebate. Individuals with gross income up to 6.5 lakh rupees will not need to pay any tax if they make investments in provident funds and prescribed equities :FM Piyush Goyal
 
  • Individual taxpayers with annual income up to 5 lakh rupees to get full tax rebate

  • Individuals with gross income up to 6.5 lakh rupees will not need to pay any tax if they make investments in provident funds and prescribed equities
[post_ads]
  • Around 3 crore middle class taxpayers will get tax exemption due to this measure:

  • Standard tax deduction for salaried persons raised from 40,000 rupees to 50,000 rupees:

  • TDS threshold on interest on bank and post office deposits raised from 10,000 to 40,000 rupees

  • TDS threshold on rental income raised from 1.8 lakh to 2.4 lakh rupees
[post_ads_2]
: FM Shri Piyush Goyal
 
budget-2019-20-it-bank-interest-exemption

budget-2019-20-it-full-tax-rebate-5-lakh

budget-2019-20-it-no-tax-upto-6-lakh-50-thousand

budget-2019-20-it-standard-deduction
 

Revised travel entitlements on Duty Passes, Privilege Passes and Post Retirement Complimentary Passes as per 7th CPC Pay Level in Pay Matrix

$
0
0
Revised travel entitlements on Duty Passes, Privilege Passes and Post Retirement Complimentary Passes as per 7th CPC Pay Level in Pay Matrix: Railway Board Order

RBE No. 16 /2019
भारत सरकार GOVERNMENT OF INDIA)
रेल मंत्रालय MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS
(रेलवे बोर्ड) (RAILWAY BOARD)

No. E(W)2016/PS5-1/8
New Delhi, dated 31.01.2019

The General Managers (P)
All Zonal Railways &
Productions Units.

Sub: Revised travel entitlements on Duty Passes, Privilege Passes and Post Retirement Complimentary Passes (PRCP).
[post_ads]
Consequent to implementation of 7th CPC’s recommendations and notification of Railway Services (Revised Pay) Rules – 2016 (RSPR) w.e.f. 01.01.2016, the matter regarding linking of travel entitlements on Duty Passes, Privilege Passes/PTOs and PRCP with the ‘Pay Level in Pay Matrix’ (PLPM) has been examined in consultation with Commercial and Finance Dtes. The Competent Authority has accorded his approval for. the revised travel entitlements on status (i.e. Gazetted/Non-gazetted) cum PLPM basis as indicated in Annexure-I (for Duty Pass) and Annexure-II (for Privilege Pass/PRCP).

2. In all other respects, the extant provisions of Railway Servants (Pass) Rules, 1986 (Second Edition-1993) will continue to apply.

3. The revised travel entitlements would take effect from 01.01.2016. Accordingly, PRCP/Widow Pass travel entitlement of the railway servants retired/deceased in the interregnum shall be re-fixed by the Pass Issuing Authorities.

4. This issues with the concurrence of the Finance Directorate of Ministry of Railways.

5. Hindi version will follow.

Encl: Annexures I & II.
[post_ads_2]
sd/-
(V. Muralidliaran)
Dy. Director Estt. (Welfare)-I
Railway Board

travel-entitlement-duty-pass-railway-board-order

travel-entitlement-privilege-post-retirement-complimentary-pass-railway-board-order

[http://www.indianrailways.gov.in/railwayboard/uploads/directorate/establishment/E(W)/2019/RBE_16_2019.pdf]

Procedure for release of funds for condiment expenditure: CGDA Clarification

$
0
0
Procedure for release of funds for condiment expenditure: CGDA Clarification

Controller General of Defence Accounts
Ulan Batar Road, Palam, Delhi Cant , 110010

No. AT/IX/9504/Condi. Expdr. 
Dated 30/01/2019

To

All Regional PCsDA/CsDA (Through CGDA Website)

Sub: Procedure for release of funds for condiment expenditure - seeking of nominal rolls with individual signatures.
*****

It has come to the notice of this HQrs that some of the PCsDA/CsDA have been insisting on the requirement of nominal roll duly signed by individuals while processing condiment expenditure claims of the units.
[post_ads]
2. The issue has been examined in consultation with field PCsDA/CsDA and it is seen that unit is required to forward:

i) Statement of expenditure for preceding half yearly before applying advance for second half duly verifying the strength by LAO/RAO.

ii) In half yearly statement of expenditure, unit has:to forward paid vouchers alongwith ration strength duly verified by LAO & other supporting documents.

iii) Since it is an advance, quarterly statement of expenditure are being submitted for Audit & balance if any is deposited through MRO.

3. Accordingly, it has been decided with the approval of the competent authority that nominal roll/strength of the unit verified/authenticated by Unit Commander should suffise and individual signatures may not be initiated while releasing/ processing claims for releasing advance for condiment expenditure.
[post_ads_2]
4. This issues with the approval of Addl CGDA (Fin).

Accounts Officer (AT-IX)

[http://cgda.nic.in/audit/circulars/ANT-IX-Procedure-310119.pdf]

हिंदी शिक्षण योजना - हिंदी परीक्षा - प्रश्न-पत्र निर्धारकों/परीक्षकों उत्तरपुस्तिकाओं के मूल्यांककों आदि को देय मानदेय/पारिश्रमिक में वृद्धि

$
0
0
हिंदी शिक्षण योजना - हिंदी परीक्षा - प्रश्न—पत्र निर्धारकों/परीक्षकों उत्तरपुस्तिकाओं के मूल्यांककों आदि को देय मानदेय/पारिश्रमिक में वृद्धि

फा.सं0 21034/11/2017—रा.भा.(प्रशि.)
भारत सरकार
गृह मंत्रालय
राजभाषा विभाग

नई दिल्ली—1, दिनांक 14 दिसंबर 2018

कार्यालय ज्ञापन

विषय:— हिंदी शिक्षण योजना के अधीन हिंदी परीक्षाओं के आयोजन के लिए प्रश्न—पत्र निर्धारकों/परीक्षकों उत्तरपुस्तिकाओं के मूल्यांककों आदि को देय मानदेय/पारिश्रमिक में वृद्धि किया जाना।
[post_ads]
हिंदी शिक्षण योजना के अंतर्गत हिंदी प्रबोध/प्रवीण/प्राज्ञ और हिंदी टंकण एवं हिंदी आशुलिपि परीक्षाओं के आयोजन के लिए प्रश्न पत्र निर्धारकों, परीक्षकों, उत्तरपुस्तिकाओं के मूल्यांककों आदि को देय मानदेय/पारिश्रमिक की दरों के संशोधन से संबंधित मामले में निर्णय लिया गया है कि उपर्युक्त परीक्षाओं के आयोजन के संबंध में नियुक्त प्रश्न—पत्र निर्धारकों, परीक्षकों, उत्तरपुस्तिकाओं के मूल्यांककों आदि को देय मानदेय/पारिश्रमिक की दरें निम्नानुसार होंगी:—

क्र.स. कार्य मानदेय/पारिश्रमिक की दरें (₹)
1. प्रश्न पत्र तैयार करना (हिंदी प्रबोध, प्रवीण, प्राज्ञ एवं पारंगत) ₹525/-
2. प्रश्न पत्र तैयार करना (हिंदी टंकण/आशुलिपि) ₹375/-
3. प्रश्न पत्र की मॉडरेशन (हिंदी प्रबोध, प्रवीण, प्राज्ञ एवं पारंगत) ₹150/-
4. प्रश्न पत्र की मॉडरेशन (हिंदी टंकण/आशुलिपि) ₹150/-
5. प्रश्न पत्र की प्रूफ रीडिंग (हिंदी प्रबोध, प्रवीण, प्राज्ञ एवं पारंगत) ₹ 120/-
6. प्रश्न पत्र की प्रूफ रीडिंग (हिंदी टंकण/आशुलिपि) ₹120/-
7. आशुलिपि की परीक्षा में डिक्टेशन ₹150/-
8. परीक्षा केन्द्र अधीक्षक की नियुक्ति  ₹400/- प्रति सत्र
9. पर्यवेक्षकों (इनविजीलेटर) की नियुक्ति ₹300/-प्रति सत्र
10. परीक्षा केंद्रों पर लिपिकों की नियुक्ति ₹200/-प्रति सत्र
11. परीक्षा केंद्रों पर चतुर्थ श्रेणी (एम.टी.एस.) कर्मचारियों की नियुक्ति ₹150/- प्रति सत्र
12. मुख्य परीक्षक (मुख्य परीक्षक को प्रत्येक परीक्षक/जांचकर्ता के कम से कम 10 उत्तर पत्रों की जांच करनी होगी।) ₹300/-प्रति जांचकर्ता
13.(क) उत्तर पुस्तिकाओं का जांच कार्य (हिंदी प्रबोध, प्रवीण, प्राज्ञ एवं पारंगत) ₹11/-प्रति उत्तरपुस्तिका
13.(ख) पत्राचार माध्यम से किए जाने वाले प्रबोध, प्रवीण, प्राज्ञ पाठ्यक्रमों की उत्तर पुस्तिकाओं (ऑन्सर किट) का मुल्यांकन प्रति ₹11/-उत्तरपुस्तिका
14. उत्तर पुस्तिकाओं का जांच कार्य (हिंदी टंकण/आशुलिपि)₹11/-प्रति उत्तरपुस्तिका
15. मौखिक परीक्षा के लिए (₹11/- प्रति प्रशिक्षार्थी) (₹100/- न्यूनतम)
16. परीक्षा परिणाम की सारणी तैयार करना (प्रति 100 प्रशिक्षार्थी) ₹150/-
17. परीक्षा परिणाम की क्रास चैकिंग/मिलान करना (प्रति 100 प्रशिक्षार्थी) ₹110/-

2. उपरोक्त दरें इस कार्यालय ज्ञापन के जारी होने की तारीख से प्रभावी होंगी।
[post_ads_2]
3. यह कार्यालय ज्ञापन इस विभाग के दिनांक 27 जनवरी 2011 के कार्यालय ज्ञापन संख्या 14034(21034)/50/2010—राभा(प्रशि) में संशोधन करते हुए तथा आंतरिक वित्त—2 (गृह), गृह मंत्रालय की डा.सं. 508—एस.एस.ए.एंड एफ.ए. दिनांक 11 दिसंबर 2018 में दी गई सहमति से जारी किया जाता है।

ह./- 
(मंजुला सक्सैना)
उप सचिव, भारत सरकार

Source: Click here to view/download the PDF
[http://rajbhasha.nic.in/sites/default/files/trg14dec18.pdf]
Viewing all 16271 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>